# Age and race/ethnicity differences in decisional conflict in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ

**Authors:** Cecilia Portugal, Albert J. Farias, Erika L. Estrada, Aniket A. Kawatkar

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-02935-1 · BMC Women's Health · 2024-02-04

## TL;DR

This study found that younger women with ductal carcinoma in situ experience more decisional conflict about treatment options compared to older women.

## Contribution

The study identifies age and race/ethnicity as factors influencing decisional conflict in DCIS treatment decisions.

## Key findings

- Women aged 60–69 reported lower overall decisional conflict scores compared to those younger than 50.
- Women over 70 had lower clarity and effective decision-making scores compared to younger age groups.
- Black women reported lower decisional conflict and informed decision scores compared to white women.

## Abstract

Women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) face confusion and uncertainty about treatment options. The objective of this study was to determine whether there are differences in decisional conflict about treatment by age and race/ethnicity.

A cross-sectional survey was conducted of women (age ≥ 18) diagnosed with DCIS enrolled at Kaiser Permanente of Southern California. The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) measured personal perceptions of decision uncertainty, values clarity, and effective decision-making. We used a multivariable regression to study whether age, race, and ethnicity were associated with patient-reported DCS.

45% (N = 1395) of women who received the online survey, participated. The mean age was 56 (± 9.6) years, the majority were white. Compared to women younger than 50, women aged 60–69 reported lower overall DCS scores (-5.4; 95% CI -1.5 to -9.3). Women > 70 had lower values clarity scores (-9.0; 95% CI -2.8 to -15.2) about their treatment compared to women aged 50–59 and 60–69 (-7.1; 95% CI -2.9 to -11.3 and − 7.2; 95% CI -2.9 to -11.5) and likewise, lower effective decision-making scores (-5.4; 95% CI -1.7 to -9.2 and − 5.2; 95% CI -1.4 to -9.0) compared to women < 50. Compared to whites, blacks reported lower decision conflict (-4.4; 95% CI 0.04 to -8.8) and lower informed decision (-5.2; 95% CI -0.18 to -10.3) about DCIS treatment.

Younger women reported higher decisional conflict about DCIS treatment, compared to older women (> 70). Age based tailored discussions about treatment options, health education, and supportive decision-making interventions/tools may reduce decision conflict in future DCIS patients.

The IRB number is 10678.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** ductal carcinoma in situ (MONDO:0005023), DCIS (MONDO:0005023)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** DCIS (MESH:D002285)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10840155/full.md

## References

41 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10840155/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10840155