# Real-World Experience on Why Research Flatlines: A Review of Trials From the Coordinator’s Perspective

## TL;DR

This paper reviews why some research trials fail, showing that poor planning is a major issue in unsuccessful studies.

## Contribution

The paper provides a coordinator's perspective on common issues in trial success and failure.

## Key findings

- Unsuccessful trials had twice as many issues as successful ones.
- Study planning was the main problem in failed trials.
- Successful trials faced more staff-related challenges.

## Abstract

Introduction: Investigator-initiated research trial failure is a national concern that hinders the dissemination of information while wasting resources, time, and funding. The goal of this analysis was to provide an objective review of points to consider increasing an investigator’s chances of success.

Methods: The included trials were divided into two groups based on whether they were successful or unsuccessful in meeting enrollment goals. Common issues were noted for each trial to identify prevalent issues and compare their quantity within each group.

Results: Unsuccessful trials averaged twice as many issues as trials in the successful group. The most common problems identified in unsuccessful studies involved study planning, whereas the most common problems identified in successful studies revolved around study staff.

Conclusions: There is no single definitive indicator for trial failure; however, awareness of these issues in a trial’s planning phase can help prevent their occurrence and aid in overall completion and publication.