Corrigendum to: Surgery versus radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: Shared decision making in a multidisciplinary clinic
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Center
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeningioma and schwannoma management · Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment · Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
This is a corrigendum to: Francesca Colombo, Helen Maye, Scott Rutherford, Andrew King, Charlotte Hammerbeck-Ward, Gillian A Whitfield, Catherine McBain, Rovel Colaco, Helen Entwistle, Andrea Wadeson, Simon Lloyd, Simon Freeman, Omar N Pathmanaban, Surgery versus radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: Shared decision making in a multidisciplinary clinic, Neuro-Oncology Advances, Volume 5, Issue 1, January-December 2023, vdad089, https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad089
The data has been corrected/clarified as follows for the corresponding figures listed (corrections in italics):
In paragraph three of Results, “Fairly consistent numbers of patients of all ages opted for a WWR approach; with relatively high numbers of patients opting for surgical intervention as opposed to SRS” can be clarified as “Fairly consistent numbers of patients of all ages opted for a WWR approach; with relatively high numbers of patients under 50 years opting for surgical intervention as opposed to SRS.”
The revisions made do not change the outcomes or messages of the paper, nor the conclusions stated therein.