# Beefing up communication skills of upper-level animal science students

**Authors:** Shannon L Norris-Parish, Holli R Leggette, Theresa Pesl Murphrey, Jean A Parrella, Audra Richburg, Andy D Herring

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/tas/txae007 · Translational Animal Science · 2024-01-12

## TL;DR

This study examines how upper-level animal science students communicate and identifies ways to improve their communication skills for better workforce readiness.

## Contribution

The study identifies communication styles and effectiveness of animal science students and provides curricular recommendations to enhance their communication skills.

## Key findings

- Male students preferred assertive communication while female students preferred collaborative communication.
- Supplemental communication training improved students' project presentation scores significantly.
- Students demonstrated strong industry knowledge but needed improvement in oral communication and teamwork.

## Abstract

Animal scientists face an increasing need to communicate with the lay public because of the public’s interest in the origin and production of animal-sourced foods. Consumers’ increased interest infers a critical need for effective communication skills among animal science graduates. Effective communication skills are mandatory if students are to explain scientific information and mitigate misinformation about livestock production. The purpose of our study was to investigate the communication styles and communication effectiveness of upper-level animal science students enrolled in a beef cattle production and management course at Texas A&M University across five semesters (N = 241; spring 2018 = 61, summer 2018 = 15, Fall 2018 = 54, spring 2019 = 55, and fall 2019 = 56). Male animal science students (n = 25; 32.9%) preferred assertive and direct communication (a driver communication style) and female students (n = 32; 19.4%) preferred collaborative and accommodating communication (an amiable communication style). Students were moderately experienced with beef cattle production (M = 3.09, SD = 1.07) before enrolling in the course; however, former beef cattle experiences did not influence their preferred communication style [F(10, 230) = 0.36, P = 0.96]. Researchers also observed students’ communication skills during an end-of-semester beef cattle production and management project presentation and identified strengths and weaknesses. Students demonstrated strong, in-depth animal industry knowledge, an ability to connect beef production techniques to management success, and critical thinking skills when answering questions. Oral communication skills warranting improvement included integrating visual aids and/or visual slides to support findings, using improved stage presence and confidence, and sharing responsibilities when presenting as a team. Finally, completion of a supplemental communication training module, intended to develop oral communication skills, significantly improved [F(1, 55) = 4.16, P = 0.046] students’ beef cattle production and management project presentation scores. As students become aware of their communication preferences and tendencies, they become equipped to adjust their communication practices and techniques when needed. Through this study, we gained insight into students’ communication tendencies and skills, which can be used to provide curricular recommendations and enhance students’ workforce readiness.

We identified the communication styles and communication effectiveness of upper-level, collegiate animal science students and, as a result, provided curricular and instructional recommendations that could improve students’ workforce development opportunities and communication preparation in the animal science industries.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** animal science (MESH:D000820), CAC (MESH:D003147), ASAS (MESH:C000719191), ruminant (MESH:D000079562), 4-H (MESH:D053632)
- **Chemicals:** salt (MESH:D012492), H (MESH:D006859), minerals (MESH:D008903), FFA (MESH:D005230)
- **Species:** Coturnix coturnix (Common quail, species) [taxon 9091], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10836500/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10836500/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10836500