# Comparable Efficacy of Oral Bendamustine versus Intravenous Administration in Treating Hematologic Malignancies

**Authors:** Megan J. Cracchiolo, Lisa Davis, Andrew P. Matiatos, Dan W. Davini, Muhammad Husnain, Richard J. Simpson, Vasilios Voudouris, Emmanuel Katsanis

PMC · DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3848777/v1 · Research Square · 2024-01-16

## TL;DR

This study shows that an oral form of bendamustine is as effective as the intravenous version in treating blood cancers in mice.

## Contribution

A novel oral bendamustine formulation with comparable efficacy to intravenous administration is introduced.

## Key findings

- Oral bendamustine showed 51.4% bioavailability in mice.
- Antitumor efficacy of oral and intravenous bendamustine was comparable in three cancer models.
- The oral formulation achieved systemic exposure sufficient for in-vivo efficacy.

## Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze potential differences in antitumor efficacy and pharmacokinetics between intravenous (IV) bendamustine (BEN) and a novel orally administered bendamustine agent (PO) that is utilizing the beneficial properties of superstaturated solid dispersions formulated in nanoparticles.

Pharmacokinetics of IV versus PO BEN were determined by analysis of plasma samples collected from NSG mice treated with either IV or PO BEN. Plasma samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) following a liquid-liquid extraction to determine peak BEN concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the half-life (t1/2) in-vivo. in-vitro cytotoxicity of BEN against human non-Hodgkin’s Burkitt’s Lymphoma (Raji), multiple myeloma (MM.1s), and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (RS4;11) cell lines was determined over time using MTS assays. Luciferase-tagged versions of the aforementioned cell lines were used to determine in-vivo BEN cytotoxicity of IV versus PO BEN at two different doses.

Bendamustine at a high dose in-vitro causes cell death. There was no significant difference in antitumor efficacy between IV and novel PO BEN at a physiologically relevant concentration in all three xenograft models. In-vivo pharmacokinetics showed the oral bioavailability of BEN in mice to be 51.4%.

The novel oral BEN agent tested exhibits good oral bioavailability and systemic exposure for in-vivo antitumor efficacy comparable to IV BEN. An oral BEN formulation offers exciting clinical potential as an additional method of administration for bendamustine and warrants further evaluation in clinical studies.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** bendamustine (PubChem CID 65628)
- **Diseases:** multiple myeloma (MONDO:0009693), B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (MONDO:0004947)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (taxon 10090)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Hematologic Malignancies (MESH:D019337), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (MESH:D054198), cytotoxicity (MESH:D064420), multiple myeloma (MESH:D009101), non-Hodgkin's Burkitt's Lymphoma (MESH:D008228)
- **Chemicals:** BEN (MESH:D000069461)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090]
- **Cell lines:** Raji — Homo sapiens (Human), EBV-related Burkitt lymphoma, Cancer cell line (CVCL_0511), MM.1s — Mus musculus (Mouse), Hybridoma (CVCL_U609), RS4;11 — Homo sapiens (Human), Adult B acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Cancer cell line (CVCL_0093)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10836110/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10836110/full.md

## References

31 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10836110/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10836110