Stress and associated factors in public school teachers: a cross-sectional study
Lívia de Araújo Rocha, Andressa Santos de-Carvalho, Patrícia Regina Evangelista de-Lima, Bruna Araújo Gomes, Letícia Gonçalves Paulo, Rauene Raimunda de-Sousa, Luísa Helena de Oliveira Lima, Ana Roberta Vilarouca da-Silva

TL;DR
This study explores stress levels and contributing factors among public school teachers in Piauí, Brazil, highlighting the need for health interventions.
Contribution
The study provides empirical evidence on stress in public school teachers, emphasizing gender and health-related factors.
Findings
Most participants were women, with significant stress levels observed in this group.
Teachers with thyroid problems showed statistically significant higher stress levels.
Over half of the teachers worked multiple shifts, contributing to stress and health issues.
Abstract
The search for improving productivity and performance at work has exposed workers to high levels of stress. Since the working conditions of basic education teachers interfere negatively with their health, it is important to study the entire context involving teachers, in order to encourage the promotion of workers’ health actions. To investigate stress levels and associated factors in public school teachers. The study was conducted through online questionnaires sent to public school teachers in the state of Piauí, in 2020, using the snowball method. Sociodemographic and economic characteristics and risk habits (smoking, alcoholism, and sedentary lifestyle) of the study sample were investigated, as well as clinical, anthropometric, and stress-related conditions. A total of 126 teachers participated in the study, most of which were women (88.9%), had a family income from three to four…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Variables | n | % | Median (p25th-p75th) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Female | 112 | 88.9 | |
| Male | 14 | 11.1 | |
| Skin color/ethnicity | |||
| White | 42 | 33.3 | |
| Black | 10 | 7.9 | |
| Brown | 71 | 56.3 | |
| Others | 3 | 2.4 | |
| Age range (years) | 38.0 (32.0-45.0) | ||
| 18-23 | 6 | 4.8 | |
| 24-30 | 14 | 11.1 | |
| 31-35 | 26 | 20.6 | |
| 36-40 | 26 | 20.6 | |
| > 41 | 54 | 42.9 | |
| Marital status | |||
| Single | 40 | 31.7 | |
| Married | 65 | 51.6 | |
| Divorced/separated | 6 | 4.8 | |
| Widower | 2 | 1.6 | |
| Stable union | 13 | 10.3 | |
| Family income (minimum salaries) | |||
| 1-2 | 25 | 19.8 | |
| 3-4 | 38 | 30.2 | |
| 5-6 | 32 | 25.4 | |
| > 6 | 31 | 24.6 | |
| Educational level | |||
| Complete secondary school | 6 | 4.7 | |
| Complete higher education | 85 | 67.5 | |
| Incomplete higher education | - | - | |
| Non-graduate degree studies | 31 | 24.6 | |
| Graduate degree | 4 | 3.2 | |
| Work shift | |||
| Morning | 27 | 21.4 | |
| Afternoon | 24 | 19.0 | |
| Evening | 5 | 4.0 | |
| Two shifts or more | 70 | 55.6 | |
| Time in the job (years) | |||
| 1-2 | 6 | 4.8 | |
| 3-5 | 15 | 11.9 | |
| 6-10 | 23 | 18.2 | |
| 11-15 | 28 | 22.2 | |
| More than 15 | 53 | 42 .1 | |
| Less than 1 | 1 | 0.8 |
| Variables | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| Smoking | ||
| Smoker | 2 | 1.6 |
| Non-smoker | 124 | 98.4 |
| Drinking behavior | ||
| Low risk drinking | 120 | 95.2 |
| Risky or hazardous drinking | 6 | 4.8 |
| Harmful drinking | - | - |
| Likely alcohol dependence | - | - |
| Physical activity level | ||
| Sedentary | 26 | 20.6 |
| Insuficiently active | 42 | 33.3 |
| Active | 39 | 31.0 |
| Very active | 19 | 15.1 |
| Variables | n | % | Mean ± SD | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI (kg/m²) | 25.19 ± 4.36 | 24.42-25.95 | ||
| Underweight | 4 | 3.2 | ||
| Normal range | 64 | 50.8 | ||
| Overweight | 35 | 27.8 | ||
| Obesity grade I | 19 | 15.0 | ||
| Obesity grade II | 4 | 3.2 | ||
| Obesity grade III | - | - | ||
| Chronic diseases | ||||
| Yes | 26 | 20.6 | ||
| No | 100 | 79.4 | ||
| Hypertension | 13 | 10.3 | ||
| Diabetes | 3 | 2.4 | ||
| Musculoskeletal diseases | 11 | 8.7 | ||
| Thyroid-related problems | 4 | 3.2 |
| Total score (mean ± SD) | Median |
|---|---|
| 26.32 ± 8.88 | 26.0 |
| Variables | Stress | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Median (p25th-p75th) | p-value* | |
| Sex | 0.003 | ||
| Female | 27.1 ± 8.7 | 27.0 (22.0-30.0) | |
| Male | 20.1 ± 7.5 | 18.5 (15.2-25.2) | |
| Skin color/ethnicity | 0.666 | ||
| White | 27.1 ± 9.5 | 26.5 (21.0-30.0) | |
| Black | 27.8 ± 5.1 | 27.5 (26.2-28.7) | |
| Brown | 25.6 ± 9.0 | 26.0 (19.0-29.5) | |
| Others | 26.6 ± 3.7 | 25.0 (24.0-28.0) | |
| Age range (years) | 0.977 | ||
| 18-23 | 27.3 ± 8.2 | 26.0 (20.2-34.7) | |
| 24-30 | 26.0 ± 7.4 | 27.0 (22.2-28.7) | |
| 31-35 | 26.5 ± 6.2 | 27.5 (22.2-29.0) | |
| 36-40 | 27.2 ± 11.6 | 25.0 (18.2-35.2) | |
| > 40 | 25.7 ± 9.0 | 26.0 (20.2-30.0) | |
| Marital status | 0.799 | ||
| Single | 25.7 ± 8.6 | 24.0 (20.0-29.2) | |
| Married | 26.5 ± 9.2 | 27.0 (21.0-30.0) | |
| Divorced | 24.1 ± 4.3 | 25.0 (20.2-27.5) | |
| Widower | 27.0 ± 1.4 | 27.0 (26.5-27.5) | |
| Stable union | 28.1 ± 10.1 | 26.0 (22.0-35.0) | |
| Family income (minimum salaries) | 0.679 | ||
| 1-2 | 24.7 ± 7.8 | 24.0 (20.0-28.0) | |
| 3-4 | 26.8 ± 8.6 | 26.0 (22.0-30.0) | |
| 5-6 | 26.2 ± 9.1 | 26.5 (18.7-31.0) | |
| > 6 | 27.0 ± 8.6 | 28.0 (22.0-30.0) | |
| Educational level | 0.454 | ||
| Complete secondary school | 31.1 ± 13.3 | 29.0 (24.5-35.0) | |
| Complete higher education | 25.6 ± 8.6 | 26.0 (21.0-29.0) | |
| Non-degree graduate studies | 26.5 ± 8.7 | 27.0 (17.5-30.5) | |
| Graduate degree | 31.0 ± 7.5 | 28.0 (26.0-33.0) | |
| Work shift | 0.154 | ||
| Morning | 29.2 ± 9.6 | 27.0 (23.0-36.0) | |
| Afternoon | 23.0 ± 8.5 | 21.5 (18.0-28.2) | |
| Evening | 24.6 ± 4.5 | 26.0 (24.0-28.0) | |
| Two shifts or more | 26.4 ± 8.6 | 26.5 (22.0-30.0) | |
| Time in the job (years) | 0.436 | ||
| 1-2 | 21.3 ± 3.3 | 20.5 (19.2-21.0) | |
| 3-5 | 29.7 ± 9.9 | 28.0 (22.0-37.0) | |
| 6-10 | 26.7 ± 6.9 | 27.0 (23.5-29.0) | |
| 11-15 | 25.5 ± 7.6 | 26.0 (20.7-28.5) | |
| More than 15 | 26.2 ± 10.2 | 26.0 (19.0-30.0) | |
| Less than 1 | 24.0 ± 0.0 | 24.0 (24.0-24.0) | |
| Smoking | 0.791 | ||
| Smoker | 24.3 ± 12.0 | 24.5 (20.2-28.7) | |
| Non-smoker | 26.3 ± 8.8 | 26.3 ± 8.8 | |
| Drinking behavior | 0.222 | ||
| Low risk drinking | 26.5 ± 8.9 | 26.5 ± 8.9 | |
| Risky or hazardous drinking | 21.5 ± 7.0 | 21.5 ± 7.0 | |
| Harmful drinking | - | - | |
| Likely alcohol dependence | - | - | |
| Physical activity level | 0.068 | ||
| Sedentary | 30.1 ± 10.6 | 29.0 (24.2-37.0) | |
| Insuficiently active | 24.7 ± 8.7 | 24.0 (20.0-28.0) | |
| Active | 25.8 ± 7.8 | 26.0 (21.0-29.5) | |
| Very active | 25.4 ± 7.6 | 25.0 (20.0-28.5) | |
| BMI | 0.891 | ||
| Low weight | 27.2 ± 7.7 | 25.5 (21.0-31.7) | |
| Normal weight | 26.7 ± 9.3 | 26.0 (22.0-30.0) | |
| Overweight | 26.7 ±9.5 | 28.0 (18.0-30.5) | |
| Obesity grade I | 24.3 ± 6.9 | 26.0 (19.0-28.0) | |
| Obesity grade II | 24.0 ± 4.8 | 25.0 (21.0-28.0) | |
| Obesity grade III | - | - | |
| Chronic diseases | 0.384 | ||
| Yes | 27.9 ± 8.6 | 27.0 (22.5-30.7) | |
| No | 25.9 ± 8.9 | 26.0 (20.7-29.2) | |
| Hypertension | 0.649 | ||
| Yes | 26.6 ± 6.4 | 27.0 (22.5-30.7) | |
| No | 26.2 ± 9.1 | 26.0 (21.0-30.0) | |
| Diabetes | 0.229 | ||
| Yes | 36.0 ± 15.6 | 28.0 (27.0-41.0) | |
| No | 26.0 ± 8.6 | 26.0 (20.5-30.0) | |
| Musculoskeletal diseases | 0.975 | ||
| Yes | 25.8 ± 6.0 | 27.0 (22.5-29.0) | |
| No | 26.3 ± 9.1 | 26.0 (21.0-30.0) | |
| Thyroid problems | 0.015 | ||
| Yes | 37.0 ± 6.3 | 39.0 (34.7-41.2) | |
| No | 25.9 ± 8.7 | 26.0 (20.2-29.0) | |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOccupational Health and Burnout · Stress and Burnout Research · Workplace Health and Well-being
INTRODUCTION
Both stress and anxiety are understood as a response of our body to any threat to our integrity, in order to favor survival and adaptation to changes in our environment. However, this relationship may trigger several behaviors and diseases, impairing individual’s health.^1^
The continuous search for improving productivity and performance at work, for example, has exposed workers to high levels of stress and anxiety. Occupational stress can be caused by subjects’ perception of workplace actions and by their capacity to cope with them. In other words, in order for stress to occur, professionals have to evaluate the situation and the demands of the environment as stressors, and see themselves as having little capacity to deal with them, generating behaviors with a negative impact on their mental health.^2,3^
Some professional categories are more prone to experience stressful situations, such as teachers. The working process of an educator goes far beyond the classroom, and conditions involving teachers’ work, such as devaluation of their role within the society, low payment, as well as lack of recognition, may reflect directly on the mental health of these professionals, causing stress, vulnerability, and reduced professional skills.^4,6^
A study conducted with teachers^7^ observed that these professionals have significant rates of physical manifestations of stress, with one third of the sample showing psychological manifestations of stress above average stress scores. In another study that interviewed public school teachers, 72% of them answered that they considered their job stressful.^8^ Furthermore, public school teachers in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, participated in a study that found that 47.2% of the sample reported having a poor quality of life.^9^
Maintaining educators’ good health status is indispensable for their work to be properly performed.^5^ Thus, working conditions of basic education teachers are perceived to interfere negatively with their heath; hence, it is important to study the entire context involving teachers and their health so as to encourage the promotion of worker’s health actions, as well as improving understanding on stress-associated factors, in order to promote a discussion about the influence of work on the health of this population.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate stress levels and associated factors in public school teachers in the state of Piauí, Brazil, to characterize this population according to sociodemographic, economic, behavioral, anthropometric, clinical, and stress-related variables, and identify the possible relationships between the observed characteristics and stress levels experienced by the sample.
METHODS
TYPE OF STUDY
This is an epidemiological, analytical, cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach. The study was conducted remotely, through online questionnaires sent by a smartphone messaging application to teachers from public schools located in the state of Piauí, Brazil.
SAMPLE AND PATIENT SELECTION
The sample was obtained using the non-probabilistic exponential sampling technique known as “snowball,” which uses reference chains. Therefore, this method does not make it possible to determine the chance of participants to be selected for the research, but it is useful to study groups that are not easily accessible, such as teachers in pandemic times.^10^ In this method, an individual is invited and then indicates other people who can participate in the sample. The technique was applied until indications started to repeat themselves and when no more replies were obtained.^11^
The study included teachers of municipal or state public schools aged from 20 to 59 years who accepted to participate in the study. Workers who had some physical limitation that could modify self-reported anthropometric variables were excluded, as well as pregnant women or who had given birth less than 1 year before. A total of 126 teachers met inclusion and exclusion criteria.
DATA COLLECTION AND STUDY VARIABLES
For data collection, teachers answered a questionnaire about their sociodemographic, economic, clinical, and anthropometric characteristics; moreover, stress levels were measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), and consumption of alcohol and physical activity levels were evaluated using the questionnaires The Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire version 8 (IPAQ-8), respectively.
ETHICAL ASPECTS
The study was conducted after consideration by the Research Ethics Committee of Universidade Federal do Piauí (CEP/UFPI), via Plataforma Brasil, under no. 3.707.399. Furthermore, it complied with the Guidelines and Standards for Research Involving Human Beings, using Resolution no. 466/2012 of the National Health Council, which highlight the ethical aspects of research with humans. The participants who agreed to participate in the research received information on its objectives and justification and were invited to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF).
DATA ANALYSIS
For data analysis and curation, Pandas (version 1.1.5) and SciPy (version 1.4.1) libraries were used to formulate data structure and analysis for Python. A descriptive analysis was conducted by calculating absolute and relative frequencies of the studied variables, in addition to an analysis of means with 95% confidence intervals, as well as median with p25th-p75th and standard deviation.
The D’Agostino-Pearson test was applied to evaluate normality of distribution of quantitative variables. To verify significant differences in medians between sociodemographic and economic variables, risk factors, body mass index (BMI) and clinical conditions according to stress levels, non-parametric Mann-Whitney tests were applied for continuous variables and Kruskal-Wallis. For the correlation tests, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used to measure the strength of association between two variables. All analyses were performed considering a p-value below 0.05 (p ≤ 0.05) as statistically significant.
RESULTS
Table 1 shows the characterization of the study sample, which predominantly consisted of women (88.9%), individuals self-reported as brown (56.3%), with a median age of 38.0 years, married (51.6%), and with complete higher education (67.5%). Most professionals who completed the questionnaires answered that they had been working as a teacher for more than 15 years (42.1%), worked in two shifts or more per day (55.6%), worked mainly in the first years of elementary education, and had a family income from 3 to 4 minimum salaries (30.2%).
Table 1: Sociodemographic and economic characterization of teachers, Picos, state of Piauí, Brazil, 2020 (n = 126)
With regard to the risk behaviors adopted by the sample, 98.4% of participating teachers reported not smoking, and 1.6% reported smoking 10 or more cigarettes a day. More than a half (54.6%) said that they did not consume alcoholic beverages, and 27.7% reported consuming once or twice a month. Most of the studied population had a low risk drinking behavior (95.2%). With regard to physical activity, 33.3% of the sample was classified as insufficiently active, whereas 20.6% were classified as sedentary, as shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Characterization of variables related to risk behaviors adopted by the sample, Picos, state of Piauí, Brazil, 2020 (n = 126)
Table 3 reveals that most participants in this study had a normal range BMI (50.8%), whereas 27.8% were overweight and 3.2% had obesity grade 2. Of total participants, 10.3% reported having arterial hypertension; 8.7%, musculoskeletal diseases; 3.2%, thyroid-related problems; and 2.4%, diabetes. Mean height and weight of the sample were 1.60 cm and 65.3 kg, respectively.
Table 3: Clinical and anthropometric characterization of the sample, Picos, state of Piauí, Brazil, 2020 (n = 126)
Table 4 shows the mean and median stress levels obtained with the PSS-14 answered by the study sample. Mean stress level was 26.32 ± 8.8, with a median of 26.0 points. In the studied scale, the higher the score, the stress level experienced by the individual.
Table 4: Stress levels according to Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), Picos, state of Piauí, Brazil, 2020 (n = 126)
Tests were conducted to compare median perceived stress levels with sociodemograhic, economic, clinical, and anthropometric data and risk habits adopted by the sample and, as shown in Table 5, it was found that women had higher median stress levels, as well as teacher who self-reported as black, married, who reported a family income above six minimum salaries, with complete secondary school, who worked in the morning shift, and those who had been working as a teacher from 3 to 5 years.
Table 5: Comparison between statistically significant median stress levels between studied variables, Picos, state of Piauí, Brazil, 2020 (n = 126)
Furthermore, higher median stress levels were observed in teachers with thyroid-related problems, diabetes, and overweight.
DISCUSSION
Most participants in this study were women (88.9%), which is consistent with data from the Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP) showing that 90% of teachers working in early childhood education are women; this percentage decreases in the final years of elementary education and in secondary school, but females are still predominant, accounting for 69 and 60% of teachers, respectively. The prevalence of women is typical of the studied category.^7,9,12,13,14^
In the present study, most teachers self-reported as brown (56.3%), 33.3% as white, and 7.9% as black, in line with other studies on the same subject, in which most teachers (47.3%) also self-reported as brown.^15^ Other studies showed different results, observing that most of the studied population self-reported as white, followed by black or brown.^13,14^
The teachers evaluated were predominantly aged above 41 years (42.9%). In the studies involving this category, it is possible to observe that there was a higher prevalence of professionals of more advanced age, coherent with the finding related to time working in schools, in which 42.1% of teachers reported working as a teacher for more than 15 years, and 22.2% for 11 and 15 years.
The majority of teachers participating in the present research reported working two shifts or more a day (55.6%). In a study conducted in Popayan, Colombia, 75% of teachers reported spending more than ¾ of their working hours interacting with students, whereas 43% reported working from 48 to 63 hours a week.^16^
The teachers studied here are mostly married (51.6%), with a family income from three to four minimum salaries (30.2%). With regard to teachers’ education, 67.5% stated to have complete higher education, 4.7% to have only complete secondary school, and 24.6% reported having attended non-degree graduate studies.
Of the teachers interviewed, 98.4% reported not smoking. Other studied found a prevalence of smoking of 4.4% in teachers.^14^ Moreover, 95.2% had a low-risk drinking behavior, and 20.6% were classified as sedentary. Overweight was present in 27.8% of the teachers, 15% had obesity grade I, and 3.2% had obesity grade II.
Nutritional status is strongly influenced by the extrinsic environment. Stress can cause an unbalance in the body, affecting individual’s food consumption. Stressful situations alter hormone levels, leading to chemical changes, such as the release of glucocorticoids (corticosteroids and adrenalin), which may cause eating disorders like obesity and stimulate the reward system, thus increasing binge-eating and therefore the intake of high-calorie foods, favoring weight gain.^17,18^
Additionally, work routine, extenuating working hours, lack of social support, and stress resulting from work activities are some factors that may related to teachers’ illness, influencing life habits and inappropriate food choices, which may lead to body weight gain and thus to the development of associated comorbidities.^13,19,20,21^
In a study that assessed the stress experienced by teachers,^18^ it was found that 67.9% of the study sample was overweight/obese, who showed higher stress levels compared with normal weight teachers, although this difference was not statistically significant. Similarly to the present study, median stress levels were slightly higher in overweight teachers.
The present study observed that the most common clinical conditions in the teachers studied were hypertension (10.3%), musculoskeletal diseases (8.7%), thyroid problems (3.2%), and diabetes (2.4%).
Another study also found that 81.5% of teachers reported having more than two diseases, and 31.5% of the sample classified their health status was poor or regular. Despite significant percentages, the diseases analyzed in the study were not related to stress.^18^
In a similar study, 20.67% of the teachers studied had hypertension, 19.82% had musculoskeletal diseases, and 5.55% had diabetes. The prevalence of obesity was 29% and was higher among women.^9^ A high prevalence of overweight/obesity (47.2%) was also observed in public school teachers in the state of Bahia, Brazil, but it was more prevalent among men.^15^
As previously seen, higher median stress levels were observed in women (p = 0.003), which may be partly explained by the fact that contemporary women are exposed to higher stress burden and have to deal with a large number of social demands. Moreover, they are definitely inserted into an increasingly more competitive labor market, in addition to housework, which may generate many conflicts.^22^ Because women have innate sensitivity, they are more susceptible to the detrimental effects of stress and to the development of related diseases.^23^
Female teachers experience greater perceived pressure in the workplace compared to male teachers.^13^ Tere is a naturalization of the idea that a less qualified work is performed by women, strengthening the view that work is an extension of their household activities.^24^ The pressure experienced by modern women may interfere with their physical and mental health, thus increasing stress levels.
Furthermore, higher stress levels were observed in teachers with thyroid problems in the study sample (p = 0.015). This relationship can be explained due to the fact that stress is capable of leading to the development of several health problems in individuals.^25^ Hyperactivation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis, caused by a hormone response to stress, generates a Th2-type immune response, suppressing cell immunity and increasing humoral immunity, which may beter elucidate the reason why autoimmune diseases, such as hyperthyroidism, are preceded by high stress levels.^26,27^
The hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, the central regulatory system that controls the production of thyroid hormones, is transitorily activated during acute stressful situations, whereas prolonged stress is associated with decreased activity of this axis.^28,29,30^
However, the present study found that the profession under study may be a source of stress, which may be related to the onset of several diseases such as those addressed here.
CONCLUSIONS
An excessive amount of work activities demanded to teachers may be the cause of illness and consequent work leave among these professionals; therefore, it is important to assist this population closely and to create stress coping strategies in order to prevent the complications resulting from high stress levels, thus contributing positively to teachers’ quality of life.
Finally, it is suggested to conduct additional studies on the theme, aiming to make a robust and consistent analysis on what variables precede stress.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Oliveira CJR Do Amaral F Estresse| ansiedade| aromaterapia: pelo olhar da Osmologia, ciência do olfato e do odor Braz J Nat Sci 2019229292
- 2Maffia LN Pereira LZ Estresse no trabalho: estudo com gestores públicos do estado de Minas Gerais RE Ad Rev Eletrôn Adm (Porto Alegre)2014203658680
- 3Hirschle ALT Gondim SMG Stress and well-being at work: a literature review Cien Saude Colet 2020257272127363266755410.1590/1413-81232020257.27902017 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Delcor NS Araujo TM Reis EJ Porto LA Carvalho FM Oliveira e Silva M [Labor and health conditions of private school teachers in Vitoria da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil]Cad Saude Publica 20042011871961502932010.1590/s 0102-311x 2004000100035 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Luz JGD Pessa SLR Luz RPD Schenatto FJA [Implications of the environment, conditions and organization of work on teacher health: a systematic review]Cienc Saude Colet 201924124621463210.1590/1413-812320182412.2635201731778512 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Da Silva Hanzelmann R Pereira EAA Velasco AR Da Silva AS De Oliveira EB Passos JP Estresse do professor do Ensino Fundamental: o ambiente em evidência Res Soc Dev 202098 e 53982910
- 7Inocente NJ Hardt PDOS Chamon EMQDO Estresse e estratégias de enfrentamento em professores do ensino fundamental Rev Educ Cultura Contemporânea 20171538175198
- 8Pessanha QPL Corrêa CQ Estresse docente na Educação Infantil: um estudo sobre professores de creches públicas de uma cidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Zero-a-Seis 20151732240263
