# Echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular filling pressures in heart transplant recipients

**Authors:** Zohreh Rahbar, Anahita Tavoosi, Alireza Bakhshandeh, Maryam Mehrpooya, Akram Sardari, Farnoosh Larti, Roya Sattarzadeh Badkoubeh

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s43044-024-00443-z · The Egyptian Heart Journal · 2024-01-30

## TL;DR

This study evaluates how well echocardiography can estimate left ventricular filling pressure in heart transplant patients, finding that certain measurements are strong predictors but not fully reliable.

## Contribution

The study identifies optimal echocardiographic cutoffs and models for estimating left ventricular filling pressure in heart transplant recipients.

## Key findings

- Lateral E/e′ showed the strongest correlation with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP).
- An average E/e′ cutoff of ≥6.8 predicted LVEDP ≥20 mmHg with high sensitivity.
- Echocardiographic parameters remain less reliable than invasive measurements for LVEDP in transplant recipients.

## Abstract

Echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular filling pressure in heart transplant (HTx) recipients is challenging. The ability of echocardiography to detect elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in HTx patients was assessed in this study.

This descriptive cross-sectional study included 39 HTx recipients who were candidates for endomyocardial biopsy as a part of their routine post-transplantation surveillance. Doppler transthoracic echocardiography was done before the procedure, and left heart catheterization was done during the endomyocardial biopsy. Thirty-nine patients (15 female, 24 male), with a mean age of 39.6 years (range 13–70), were enrolled. A strong relation was observed between lateral E/e′ and LVEDP (R = 0.64, P value < 0.001) and average E/e′ and LVEDP (R = 0.6, P value < 0.001). The best cutoff value for LVEDP prediction was the average E/e′ ≥ 6.8 with a sensitivity of 96.15% and specificity of 68.5% for the prediction of LVEDP more than or equal to 20 mmHg. Two predictive models comprising age, gender, and lateral E/e′ or average E/e′ were also proposed. A significant relationship was also found between LVEDP and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (R = − 0.31, P value < 0.01).

Lateral E/e′ was the best predictor of LVEDP. The cutoff of average E/e′ had the best validity for the estimation of LVEDP. Despite the strong observed association, echocardiographic parameters cannot be considered a surrogate for invasive LVEDP measurements when seeking information about left ventricle filling pressure on heart transplant recipients.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** function (MESH:D003291), fibrosis (MESH:D005355), HTX (OMIM:605376), atrial contraction (MESH:D018880), valvular regurgitations (MESH:D006349), ischemic (MESH:D002545), inflammation (MESH:D007249), arrhythmia (MESH:D001145), heart failure (MESH:D006333), tachycardia (MESH:D013610), Diastolic dysfunction (MESH:D018487), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (MESH:D002312), cardiac allograft vasculopathy (MESH:D006331), pulmonary hypertension (MESH:D006976), atrial fibrillation (MESH:D001281), hypertension (MESH:D006973), mitral regurgitation (MESH:D008944), myocardial ischemia (MESH:D017202)
- **Chemicals:** LHC (-), LA (MESH:D007811)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10828230/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10828230/full.md

## References

29 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10828230/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10828230