# Model for Interpreting Discordant SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostic Test Results

**Authors:** Oluwaseun F. Egbelowo, Spencer J. Fox, Graham C. Gibson, Lauren Ancel Meyers

PMC · DOI: 10.3201/eid3002.230200 · Emerging Infectious Diseases · 2024-02-01

## TL;DR

A model was created to help understand conflicting SARS-CoV-2 test results, showing a low chance of infection when rapid antigen tests are positive but nucleic acid tests are negative.

## Contribution

A novel model was developed to interpret discordant SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test results in clinical settings.

## Key findings

- A patient with a positive rapid antigen test followed by a negative nucleic acid test had a 15.4% chance of being infected.
- The model estimates infection probabilities during March 2020–May 2022 in the United States.

## Abstract

We devised a model to interpret discordant SARS-CoV-2 test results. We estimate that, during March 2020–May 2022, a patient in the United States who received a positive rapid antigen test result followed by a negative nucleic acid test result had only a 15.4% (95% CI 0.6%–56.7%) chance of being infected.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** SARS-CoV-2 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), infectious diseases (MESH:D003141), influenza (MESH:D007251), infected (MESH:D007239)
- **Chemicals:** BinaxNOW (-)
- **Species:** Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (no rank) [taxon 2697049], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Respiratory syncytial virus (no rank) [taxon 12814]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10826750/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10826750/full.md

## References

10 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10826750/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10826750