# On the antimagicness of generalized edge corona graphs

**Authors:** Nivedha D, Devi Yamini S

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24002 · Heliyon · 2024-01-05

## TL;DR

This paper explores antimagic labelings in a new type of graph called generalized edge corona graphs.

## Contribution

The paper introduces and proves antimagicness of generalized edge corona graphs under specific structural conditions.

## Key findings

- A generalized edge corona graph G ⋄ (H1,H2,...,Hm) is antimagic under certain conditions.
- The proof uses an algorithmic approach for graphs with specific degree constraints.
- The result excludes spider graphs with uneven legs.

## Abstract

Given a graph G, a function of assigning distinct labels {1,2,...,|E(G)|} to E(G) such that w(a)≠w(b), ∀ a,b∈V(G) is an antimagic labeling of G where w(a) indicates the vertex sum obtained by summing up all the labels assigned to the edges incident on the vertex a. Let G, Hi, 1≤i≤m be connected graphs such that E(G)={e1,e2,...,em}. A new graph is constructed from G, Hi, 1≤i≤m by adding all possible edges between the end vertices of ei and V(Hi), i∈{1,2,...,m}. The resulting graph is called the generalized edge corona of G and (H1,H2,...,Hm) which is denoted as G⋄(H1,H2,...,Hm). We prove G ⋄ (H1,H2,...,Hm) is antimagic under certain conditions using an algorithmic approach where G has only one vertex of maximum degree three (excluding spider graphs containing uneven legs) and |V(Hi)|≥2, i∈{1,2,...,m}.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** Antimagic (-)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10826673/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10826673/full.md

## References

17 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10826673/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10826673