mSphere of Influence: The complex world of bacterial biogeography
Andrew A. Bridges

TL;DR
This article discusses how a study on the human oral microbiome influenced a researcher's shift in studying bacterial biofilms and signal transduction.
Contribution
The paper highlights a personal research trajectory change inspired by a specific microbiome study.
Findings
The study on the human oral microbiome inspired new research directions in bacterial signal transduction.
It emphasized the importance of understanding bacterial biogeography at a micron scale.
Abstract
Drew Bridges works in the field of bacterial signal transduction and studies the formation and disassembly of bacterial biofilms. In this mSphere of Influence article, he reflects on how the paper “Biogeography of a human oral microbiome at the micron scale” by Mark Welch et al. (J. L. Mark Welch, B. J. Rossetti, C. W. Rieken, F. E. Dewhirst, et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E791–E800, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522149113) inspired him to change his research trajectory.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOral microbiology and periodontitis research · Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing · Gut microbiota and health
COMMENTARY
Historically, bacteria have been thought of as comparatively simple organisms that lack the panache of their eukaryotic, “higher organism,” counterparts. We now know that this is not the case; bacteria exhibit complex behaviors, they analyze their surroundings to inform lifestyle decisions, they communicate, and they often form elaborate multi-species communities (1). As a graduate student studying cell biology, my eyes were opened to the complexity and beauty of bacterial communities through the work of Mark Welch et al. in their 2016 paper, “Biogeography of a human oral microbiome at the micron scale” (2). Their kaleidoscope-esque micrographs, which reflect the underlying physiology of an organized microbial system, inspired me to pursue a field change that led me on my current trajectory.
Biogeography is the study of where living things are found on Earth and why they are found there (3). Evolution patterns the spatial organization of living systems across size scales, from the global level to regional ecosystems to the micron scale, where microbes reign. As far back as Aristotle, naturalists have examined the spatial distribution of living organisms by eye, yet only with the advent of microscopes and molecular taxonomy has biogeography become accessible at the micron scale. Prior to the study discussed here, the same research group contributed a major technical advance to studies of biogeography at the micron scale (4). In this work, the authors developed combinatorial labeling and spectral imaging fluorescence in situ hybridization (CLASI-FISH) to differentiate dozens of taxa simultaneously in synthetic and natural mixtures of bacteria at high resolution. This approach enabled a systems-level analysis of microbial communities and their spatial interactions in unprecedented detail.
In the 2016 study, the authors focus their research on the relevant, accessible, and historically significant community of microbes found in dental plaque (2). Indeed, dental plaque was among the first samples visualized by van Leeuwenhoek through his rudimentary microscope (5). What the authors reveal is an exquisite organization that could not be described by preceding metagenomic studies (2). The group showcases a complex plaque consortia of nine predominant taxa formed around filamentous corynebacteria cells. The assemblies varied in size, spanning tens to hundreds of microns, with a reproducible spatial pattern. The spatial arrangement of each species within the configuration is suggestive of their underlying physiology, for example oxygen-sensitive species localized deep within the consortium, whereas those requiring or tolerating oxygen characteristically localized toward the community edge. Moreover, consumers of specific metabolites were found to be adjacent to producers. Collectively, this work provides a glimpse into the complex interspecies dynamics that sculpt the spatial arrangement of microbial communities.
Could the patterns of interaction and metabolic dependencies observed in dental plaque be mirrored in other microbial habitats, perhaps even pointing to universal principles of microbial organization? Current evidence suggests that microbial organization, division of labor, and specialization within natural communities are the norm (6–8). As the field journeys deeper into understanding how biogeography is established, it will be critical to use defined, multi-species, and genetically tractable communities to uncover mechanisms. Can spatial organization reminiscent of the communities observed in this study be reconstituted and monitored through development? Can genetic screens be developed to identify the critical molecular factors involved in spatial patterning? Moreover, what are the practical applications? Can we harness the knowledge of microbial biogeography to develop novel therapeutic strategies, influence microbial community behaviors, or even engineer our own microbial systems? The future of biogeography at the micron scale is rife with potential, and each answer will inevitably lead to even more questions.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Mukherjee S, Bassler BL. 2019. Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:371–382. doi:10.1038/s 41579-019-0186-530944413 PMC 6615036 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Mark Welch JL, Rossetti BJ, Rieken CW, Dewhirst FE, Borisy GG. 2016. Biogeography of a human oral microbiome at the MICRON scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E 791–800. doi:10.1073/pnas.152214911326811460 PMC 4760785 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Cox CB, Ladle R, Moore P. 2020 Biogeography: An ecological and evolutionary approach. 10th ed. Wiley.
- 4Valm AM, Mark Welch JL, Rieken CW, Hasegawa Y, Sogin ML, Oldenbourg R, Dewhirst FE, Borisy GG. 2011. Systems-level analysis of microbial community organization through combinatorial labeling and spectral imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:4152–4157. doi:10.1073/pnas.110113410821325608 PMC 3054005 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Dobell C. 1960. Antony Van Leeuwenhoek and his “little animals,” being some account of the father of protozoology and bacteriology and his multifarious discoveries in these disciplines. Harcourt, Brace and company, New York.
- 6Mc Callum G, Tropini C. 2023. The gut microbiota and its biogeography. Nat Rev Microbiol. doi:10.1038/s 41579-023-00969-037740073 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Stewart PS, Franklin MJ. 2008. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:199–210. doi:10.1038/nrmicro 183818264116 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Dragoš A, Kiesewalter H, Martin M, Hsu C-Y, Hartmann R, Wechsler T, Eriksen C, Brix S, Drescher K, Stanley-Wall N, Kümmerli R, Kovács ÁT. 2018. Division of labor during biofilm matrix production. Curr Biol 28:1903–1913. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.04629887307 PMC 6331042 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
