Correction to: Transparent communication of evidence does not undermine public trust in evidence
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics in Clinical Research
This is a correction to: John R Kerr, Claudia R Schneider, Alexandra L J Freeman, Theresa Marteau, Sander van der Linden, Transparent communication of evidence does not undermine public trust in evidence, PNAS Nexus, Volume 1, Issue 5, November 2022, pgac280, https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac280
During a retroactive audit conducted by PNAS Nexus, it was discovered that this paper was missing a statement acknowledging compliance with the PNAS Nexus Human and Animal Participants and Clinical Trials policy:
All participants in both studies provided informed consent, as per the protocols approved by the Cambridge Psychology Research Ethics Committee.
This error has been corrected in the original article.