Efficacy and feasibility of catheter ablation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation
Naoya Kataoka, Teruhiko Imamura

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
To the Editor
The number of elderly patients with multiple comorbidities, including atrial fibrillation, is increasing so far. The impact of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation on elderly patients with atrial fibrillation remains uncertain. Aldaas and colleagues demonstrated that catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation was similarly effective and feasible in patients aged 80 years or older when compared with a younger cohort.1 Several concerns have been raised.
Elderly patients had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of all‐cause death/hospitalization after catheter ablation in their unadjusted comparative analyses.1 This is not surprising as elderly patients have multiple comorbidities and more advanced sarcopenia than the younger cohort. These worse baseline characteristics may have a negative prognostic impact, regardless of the correction of atrial fibrillation. The authors also adjusted for potential confounders, and the clinical outcomes of older patients were as good as those of younger patients.1 However, the unadjusted time‐to‐event analyses may be more representative of real‐world clinical practice.
One of the procedural parameters missing from their study is the energy source.1 How many patients underwent radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation, respectively? Efficacy and feasibility seem to be comparable between the two energy sources.2 However, the applicability of such a general consensus to the elderly cohort remains unknown.
Many elderly patients have frailty, including not only physical but also mental ones. Patients with arrhythmias have more advanced depression than others. Aggressive catheter ablation may improve mental frailty in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.3 Did the authors assess patients' quality of life and mental status before and after catheter ablation?
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Aldaas OM , Darden D , Mylavarapu PS , et al. Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the very elderly (>/=80 years old): insights from the UC san diego AF ablation registry. Clin Cardiol. 2023. 10.1002/clc.24137 PMC 1071633637626475 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Jimenez‐Candil J , Hernandez Hernandez J , Cruz Galban A , et al. Clinical and economic outcomes of a systematic same‐day discharge programme after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison between cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation. Europace. 2023;25. 10.1093/europace/euad 265 PMC 1049813837669318 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Manolis TA , Manolis AA , Apostolopoulos EJ , et al. Depression and atrial fibrillation in a reciprocal liaison: a neuro‐cardiac link. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2023;1‐19.10.1080/13651501.2023.224821437615537 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
