# Recognition of pseudoinvasion in colorectal adenoma using spatial glycomics

## TL;DR

The paper introduces a new method using spatial glycomics to distinguish pseudoinvasion from true cancer invasion in colorectal tissues.

## Contribution

A novel approach using spatial glycomics and mass spectrometry imaging to differentiate pseudoinvasion from true invasion in colon adenomas.

## Key findings

- Spatial glycomic phenotypes of different tissue regions formed distinct clusters.
- Pseudoinvasion showed glycomic similarity to surface epithelium, unlike true invasion.
- Molecular phenotype in deep submucosa supports true invasion diagnosis.

## Abstract

Pseudoinvasion (PI) is a benign lesion in which cancer is mimicked in the colon by misplacement of dysplastic glands in the submucosa. Although there are morphological clues, the discrimination of PI from true invasion can be a challenge during pathological evaluation of colon adenomas. Both overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis can result in inadequate clinical decisions. This calls for novel tools to aid in cases where conventional methods do not suffice. We performed mass spectrometry imaging (MSI)-based spatial glycomics analysis on a cohort of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) material from 16 patients who underwent polypectomy. We used this spatial glycomic data to reconstruct the molecular histology of the tissue section using spatial segmentation based on uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction (UMAP). We first showed that the spatial glycomic phenotypes of the different morphological entities separated as distinct clusters in colon tissues, we separated true invasion from the other morphological entities. Then, we found that the glycomic phenotype in areas with suspected PI in the submucosa was strongly correlating with the corresponding glycomic phenotype of the adenomatous colon epithelium from the same tissue section (Pearson correlation distance average = 0.18). These findings suggest that using spatial glycomics, we can distinguish PI as having a molecular phenotype similar to the corresponding surface epithelium and true invasion as having a different phenotype even when compared to high-grade dysplasia. Therefore, when a novel molecular phenotype is found in the deepest submucosal region, this may be used as an argument in favor of true invasion.