# Comparing Surgical Techniques for Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review of Radiographic and Functional Outcomes

**Authors:** Haneen A Alhelali, Abdulrahman S Hassan, Faris A ALZahrani, Abrar A Aljubayri, Amjad A Aljubairy, Ahmed Alalasi, Ahmed S Alghamdi

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51239 · Cureus · 2023-12-28

## TL;DR

This study compares different surgical techniques for treating meniscal tears and finds some methods lead to better outcomes than others.

## Contribution

The study systematically compares surgical techniques for meniscal tears using recent clinical data.

## Key findings

- Pull-out repair and refixation techniques show better clinical outcomes than partial meniscectomy.
- Mason-Allen and simple stitches yield comparable results in meniscal repair.
- Inside-out and all-inside techniques have similar functional outcomes.

## Abstract

Meniscal tears are a common orthopedic injury. The management approaches for meniscal tears include both surgical and non-surgical procedures; however, the majority of the surgeons opt for various surgical interventions. This systematic review aimed to compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques for meniscal tears. The systemic search was carried out in various databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus. Studies that investigated surgical techniques for meniscal repair and published between 2010 to 2023 were included. Out of the 7,421 potential studies identified from databases and Google Scholar search, only 17 studies were included in our systemic review. The follow-up periods ranged from 6 weeks to 123 months. Adverse effects were reported in some studies, including joint line tenderness, swelling, and loss of flexion, while others reported no significant adverse events. Pull-out repair and refixation techniques demonstrated better clinical outcomes and slower arthritic progression than partial meniscectomy. Mason-Allen stitches and simple stitches yielded comparable results, and both inside-out and all-inside techniques had similar clinical and functional outcomes. This systematic review provides valuable insights into the outcomes of different surgical techniques for meniscal tears. Further studies with longer follow-up periods may help assess the long-term effectiveness of these surgical techniques.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Meniscal tears (MESH:D010007), laceration (MESH:D022125), loss of flexion (MESH:D016388), swelling (MESH:D004487), pain (MESH:D010146), Meniscus (MESH:D000070600), tenderness (MESH:D063806), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis (MESH:D020370), tears (MESH:D012167), arthritic (MESH:D015535), anterior cruciate ligament (MESH:D000070598), knee pain (MESH:D046788), orthopedic injury (MESH:D009140), trauma (MESH:D014947), infection (MESH:D007239), posterior root tear (MESH:D011843), joint (MESH:D007592), degenerative changes in (MESH:D019636), Osteoarthritis (MESH:D010003)
- **Chemicals:** water (MESH:D014867)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10821771/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10821771/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10821771/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10821771