Characterizing the Fault Response of the Intel Neural Compute Stick 2 Under Single-Pulse Electromagnetic Fault Injection
\v{S}tefan Ku\v{c}er\'ak, Jakub Breier, Xiaolu Hou

TL;DR
This study systematically characterizes the fault responses of the Intel Neural Compute Stick 2 under electromagnetic fault injection, revealing four outcome classes and highlighting vulnerabilities in model inference integrity.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of fault effects on the NCS2, identifying specific fault classes and demonstrating persistent degradation regimes.
Findings
Major degradation occurs in 18-31% of trials at hotspots.
Persistent accuracy loss can last until model reload.
Load-time checks are insufficient to prevent faults.
Abstract
Vision processing units and other commercial neural-network inference accelerators are increasingly deployed in safety-relevant edge applications, but their fault response under transient hardware disturbances remains poorly characterized in the open literature. For the Intel Movidius Myriad X, packaged as the Intel Neural Compute Stick 2 (NCS2), only a single feasibility study has been published. We report a systematic single-pulse electromagnetic fault injection (EMFI) campaign on the NCS2 running three ImageNet-trained convolutional neural networks (ResNet-18, ResNet-50, VGG-11) on the OpenVINO runtime. Across 1,536 spot-test trials at characterized hotspots and approximately 16,000 parameter-search trials, single pulses produce four reproducible outcome classes: no measured accuracy change, minor silent data corruption, major persistent degradation that survives across subsequent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
