Experimental Comparison of Local and Over-the-Air Phase Calibration for MIMO Arrays

TL;DR

This paper compares local and over-the-air phase calibration methods for MIMO arrays, highlighting their effectiveness, limitations, and practical deployment considerations through experimental measurements.

Contribution

It provides an experimental comparison of local and OTA phase calibration methods for MIMO systems, revealing their respective advantages and limitations.

Findings

Both methods effectively eliminate phase drift at various bandwidths.

Local calibration offers higher phase stability and is channel-independent.

OTA calibration is hardware-efficient but sensitive to multipath effects.

Abstract

Communication performance and channel estimation accuracy in MIMO systems are known to be limited by hardware impairments. Specifically, the presence of phase impairments, such as phase noise, makes real-time coherent transmission a challenging task. While phase impairment compensation is typically performed at the receiver, practical methods for enabling coherent transmission at the transmitter side remain underexplored. Established methods for OTA calibration of MIMO systems face several limitations such as assumptions of phase stationarity and accurate channel knowledge. In this work, a real-time local phase calibration method is experimentally compared with OTA calibration on a fully digital array of USRP X310 software-defined radios. Using RMS cycle-to-cycle jitter as a metric, it is shown that for low and high synchronization signal bandwidths, both approaches effectively eliminate phase drift and whiten the phase noise. Local calibration achieves higher phase stability and is channel-independent, whereas OTA calibration requires no additional hardware but is sensitive to multipath effects and channel-induced impairments. Practical deployment trade-offs are discussed based on the measurement results.