Decomposing Ensemble Spread in Lorenz '96 With Learned Stochastic Parameterizations
Birgit K\"uhbacher, Daan Crommelin, Niki Kilbertus

TL;DR
This paper systematically analyzes the sources of uncertainty in Lorenz '96 model forecasts, demonstrating how stochastic parameterizations improve ensemble spread and forecast reliability.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic approach to disentangle different uncertainty sources and evaluates various stochastic parameterizations, highlighting their impact on forecast spread.
Findings
Stochastic parameterizations with persistent structure enhance early spread growth.
Ensemble perturbations regulate trajectory decorrelation, not long-term variance.
Different uncertainty sources interact complexly, affecting forecast spread and accuracy.
Abstract
Weather and climate forecasts are inherently uncertain due to chaotic dynamics, imperfect initial conditions, and incomplete representation of the underlying physical processes. Operational ensemble forecasts aim to represent these uncertainties through forecast spread, yet many approaches yield underdispersive estimates, with spread that grows too slowly relative to forecast error. Using the two-scale Lorenz 1996 system as a widely used, controlled testbed, we design a systematic approach to disentangle intrinsic variability, initial-condition perturbations, and stochastic model uncertainty. We compare multiple ensemble configurations and parameterization strategies, including existing deterministic and autoregressive as well as novel Bayesian and flow-based approaches. Our results show that ensemble perturbations do not increase the system's long-term variance; rather, they regulate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
