Induced/Incomparable versus Ramsey
Yair Caro, Zsolt Tuza, Christina Zarb

TL;DR
This paper investigates the maximum size of graphs where all induced k-vertex subgraphs are either a specific graph H or incomparable to it, providing bounds and exact values for trees, matchings, and specific graphs.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of H-exact graphs and determines bounds and exact values of their maximum order for various classes of graphs, including trees and matchings.
Findings
Bounds for trees: (k - 1)(ceil(k/2) - 1) ≤ f(T) ≤ (k - 1)^2
Exact value for star graphs: f(K_{1,k-1}) = (k-1)(k-2)
Exact value for paths: f(P_k) = (k-1)/2 if k odd, and ((k-1)(k-2))/2 + 1 if k even
Abstract
We consider the following problem: Let and be two graphs on vertices and assume . We say that and are incomparable if neither nor contains the other. Let be a graph on vertices and let be a graph on at least vertices. Then is said to be -exact if any induced subgraph of on vertices is either isomorphic to or incomparable with . Exact() is the family of all graphs which are -exact. We pose the following problem: For a graph on vertices, determine or estimate . Among the many results obtained in this paper the following are representatives concerning trees and matchings: 1. For a tree on vertices, . 2. For , $f(K_{1,k-1}) =…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
