Sequential Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Assumptions: A Framework for Understanding Racial Disparity in Police Use of Force
Thomas Leavitt, Jake Bowers, Luke Miratrix

TL;DR
This paper introduces a sequential sensitivity analysis framework to jointly assess how assumptions about police stops and encounter biases influence the interpretation of racial disparities in police use of force.
Contribution
It develops a novel framework that varies assumptions about stops and encounter biases simultaneously, revealing their interaction effects on racial disparity conclusions.
Findings
Substantial racial disparity in force under plausible stop discrimination levels.
Disparity conclusions are fragile to modest biases in encounters.
Joint analysis uncovers interaction effects missed by separate sensitivity analyses.
Abstract
Inferring racial discrimination in police use of force -- the average causal effect of civilian race on use of force -- requires two assumptions about policing prior to potential use of force: that officers do not discriminate in whom they would stop (no discrimination in stops) and that, conditional on patrol context, the probability that an encounter is with a minority rather than a white civilian does not vary across encounters (no bias in encounters). As Knox et al. (2020) show, violations of the first can mask racial disparity in force. Whether it reflects discrimination in force also depends on the second. Existing sensitivity analyses address one assumption at a time. We develop a framework that varies both sequentially and apply it to NYPD Stop, Question, and Frisk data (2003--2013). Under plausible levels of discrimination in stops, we find substantial racial disparity in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
