Automated Detection of Urological Events in Bladder Pressure Signals with a Two-Stage Machine Learning Framework Validated on External Datasets

TL;DR

This study presents a two-stage machine learning framework that accurately detects urological events from single-channel bladder pressure signals, validated on external datasets, paving the way for non-invasive, ambulatory bladder monitoring.

Contribution

The paper introduces a novel two-stage multilayer perceptron model trained and validated on multiple datasets for automated urological event classification from Pves signals.

Findings

Achieved 84% accuracy in detecting voiding contractions.

Reaching 90% accuracy in classifying abdominal vs. detrusor overactivity.

Model demonstrated good generalizability across independent datasets.

Abstract

Objective: Conventional urodynamics (UDS) provide critical diagnostic information, but requires invasive dual catheterization and manual labeling of clinically important events. Wireless, catheter-free bladder function tests are becoming available for home use, but only provide vesical pressure (Pves). We developed a machine learning framework that was trained and externally validated on UDS data for automated urological event classification from single-channel (Pves) recordings. Methods: We analyzed 118 annotated UDS traces segmented into 0.8-second Pves intervals. Using the discrete wavelet transform, we extracted 55 statistical features per segment. Consecutive segments (233,338 segments; three classes) sharing the same class, abdominal (ABD), detrusor overactivity (DO), or voiding contraction (VOID), were grouped into events, and median feature aggregation was applied to derive event-level representations. Using an imbalanced dataset, we trained a two-stage multilayer perceptron (MLP): Stage 1 distinguished VOID vs non-VOID, and Stage 2 classified non-VOID into ABD and DO. The model was trained on two independent datasets and externally validated on a third independent dataset. Additional cross-dataset training-validation permutations were performed to assess generalizability. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1-macro, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: Stage 1 (VOID vs. non-VOID) achieved 84% accuracy (balanced accuracy 76%), F1-macro 0.74, and AUC 0.85, while Stage 2 (ABD vs. DO) reached 90% accuracy (balanced accuracy 80%), F1-macro 0.80, and AUC 0.87. Permutation feature importance indicated that most features contributed meaningfully. Conclusion: Our machine learning approach enables accurate automated detection of urological events from Pves, demonstrating feasibility for single-channel monitoring and future ambulatory applications.