Optical analogy for stellarators: Ridges as caustics and coils as singularities
Wrick Sengupta, Stefan Buller, Rogerio Jorge, John Kappel, Andrew Brown, Richard Nies, Pedro F. Gil, Nikita Nikulsin, Per Helander, Amitava Bhattacharjee

TL;DR
This paper develops an analytical theory linking ridges in stellarator flux surfaces to optical caustics, unifying plasma and coil structures through geometrical optics principles.
Contribution
It introduces a novel optical analogy framework for understanding ridge formation and coil placement in stellarators, grounded in geometrical optics and topological constraints.
Findings
Ridges correspond to magnetic field line caustics.
Coil and ridge locations are constrained by a zero-determinant manifold.
More compact devices naturally develop sharp ridges on the inboard side.
Abstract
A common feature of most numerically optimized stellarator geometries is the presence of sharp ridges on outer flux surfaces, irrespective of the rotational transform. Despite their importance, an analytical theory for their existence has been lacking. In this work, we demonstrate that ridges are not artifacts but mathematical necessities. We develop such a theory for devices with quasisymmetry (QS). We demonstrate that QS exhibits close connections with the theory of geometrical optics, following Parker's ``optical analogy" (E.N. Parker, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn, 1989). By mapping vacuum QS to the eikonal equation of geometrical optics, we derive the conditions for ridge formation, identified as field line caustics where magnetic field lines focus. Furthermore, we prove a geometric theorem for stellarator coil design: both ridges and filamentary coils must lie on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
