The Higgs-top-$Z$ mass coincidence relation after NNLO matching
E. Torrente-Lujan

TL;DR
This paper reevaluates the Higgs-top-Z mass relation using NNLO matching and current electroweak data, finding it consistent within uncertainties but not as an exact sum rule, and explores symmetry explanations for the relation.
Contribution
It provides a scheme-consistent NNLO analysis of the Higgs-top-Z mass relation and investigates potential symmetry-based explanations for its near-coincidence.
Findings
The pole-level ratio $ ho_{Zt}$ is close to unity within uncertainties.
Exact geometric relation predicts $M_H$ or $M_t$ within 1.4σ of measured values.
Running-coupling analysis suggests a finite matching factor at the electroweak scale.
Abstract
The relation , previously proposed as a non-trivial Higgs mass coincidence, is reconsidered with present electroweak inputs and with a scheme-consistent matching analysis. With the 2025 PDG values for , and , and the ATLAS-CMS direct top-mass combination, the pole-level ratio is . Thus an exact pole-level geometric relation predicts either or , which is still a test rather than an exclusion. By contrast, the companion arithmetic relation gives and is not a viable exact mass sum rule. We then evaluate the complete NNLO weak-scale matching formulae at . In the standard convention one obtains…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
