Lost in Fog: Sensor Perturbations Expose Reasoning Fragility in Driving VLAs
Abhinaw Priyadershi, Jelena Frtunikj

TL;DR
This study investigates how sensor perturbations affect the reasoning and reliability of Vision-Language-Action models in autonomous driving, highlighting the importance of reasoning consistency as a safety indicator.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of VLA robustness under sensor noise, demonstrating the value of reasoning consistency for trajectory reliability and proposing runtime monitoring strategies.
Findings
Reasoning consistency correlates strongly with trajectory reliability.
Enabling Chain-of-Causation explanations improves trajectory accuracy.
Sensor noise causes approximately linear degradation in model performance.
Abstract
Interpretable autonomous driving planners depend not only on generating explanations, but also on those explanations remaining reliable under real-world sensor degradation. In this paper we present a controlled perturbation study of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) robustness in autonomous driving, evaluating Alpamayo R1 (10B parameters) across 1,996 scenarios under eight sensor perturbations (Gaussian noise at four intensities, two lighting extremes, and two fog levels; inference trials). We find that reasoning consistency is a high-fidelity indicator of trajectory reliability: when Chain-of-Causation (CoC) explanations change after perturbation, trajectory deviation spikes (21.8m vs 4.1m), with across attack types and per-sample (Cohen's ). A controlled ablation provides evidence that enabling CoC generation is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
