TL;DR
TempGlitch introduces a benchmark for evaluating vision-language models' ability to detect temporal glitches in gameplay videos, highlighting current models' limitations in temporal reasoning.
Contribution
The paper presents TempGlitch, a novel benchmark for systematic evaluation of VLMs on temporal glitch detection in videos, revealing their current shortcomings.
Findings
Current VLMs perform near chance on TempGlitch.
Denser frame sampling and larger models do not significantly improve detection.
Temporal glitches are harder to detect than spatial ones for VLMs.
Abstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly being explored for video game quality assurance, especially gameplay glitch detection. Most existing evaluations, however, treat glitches as static visual anomalies, asking models to detect failures from a single frame. We argue that this framing misses a key distinction: some glitches are spatial and visible in an isolated frame, whereas others are temporal and become evident only through changes across ordered frames. A preliminary study confirms this gap, showing that temporal glitches are substantially harder for VLMs to detect than spatial ones. To enable systematic evaluation of this underexplored setting, we introduce TempGlitch, a controlled gameplay video benchmark for temporal glitch detection. TempGlitch covers five temporal glitch types with balanced per-category samples, together with paired glitch-free videos that enable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
