$B_c \to \eta_c$ form factors at large recoil: SCET analysis and a three-loop consistency check
Guido Bell, Philipp B\"oer, Thorsten Feldmann, Dennis Horstmann, Vladyslav Shtabovenko

TL;DR
This paper uses Soft-Collinear Effective Theory to analyze $B_c o a_c$ form factors at large recoil, confirming integral equation predictions up to three loops and exploring the role of soft exchanges and divergences.
Contribution
It applies SCET to verify the double-logarithmic series and integral equations for $B_c o a_c$ form factors at large recoil, including a three-loop consistency check.
Findings
SCET confirms integral equation predictions up to three-loop order.
Endpoint divergences affect the factorization theorem but not fixed-order calculations.
Soft-quark and soft-gluon effects relate to $B_c$-meson distribution amplitudes' renormalization.
Abstract
The double-logarithmic series of non-relativistic form factors at large recoil is governed by a coupled set of integral equations, reflecting an intricate interplay between arbitrarily many soft-quark and soft-gluon exchanges. Whereas we previously derived these integral equations with diagrammatic resummation techniques, we analyze the form factors in the limit with methods from Soft-Collinear Effective Theory (SCET) in this work. Although the resulting factorization theorem for the so-called soft-overlap contribution is known to be spoilt by endpoint divergences, it can still be used at the level of bare (regularized) quantities at any fixed order in perturbation theory. By calculating the required ingredients, we show that the SCET analysis confirms the predictions of the integral equations up to three-loop order. We also argue…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
