How does limma-trend work? An empirical partially Bayes perspective
Sagnik Nandy, Wanyi Ling, and Nikolaos Ignatiadis

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the limma-trend method for high-throughput data using an empirical partially Bayes framework, introduces a nonparametric extension, and discusses FDR control under various conditions.
Contribution
It provides a new empirical Bayes perspective on limma-trend, proposes a nonparametric generalization, and enhances understanding of FDR control in high-throughput analyses.
Findings
Limma-trend computes approximate partially Bayes p-values conditioned on residual variance.
A nonparametric extension asymptotically controls FDR under dense signals.
The framework explains why some variants like MAnorm2 may fail to control FDR.
Abstract
In high-throughput biology, it is common to fit thousands of linear regressions -- one per gene, protein, or other unit -- with very few samples per unit. Limma-trend, one of the most widely used methods in this setting, improves power by shrinking variance estimates parametrically toward a fitted curve (the trend) relating variance to a unit-level summary (e.g., average intensity, peptide count), before computing p-values and applying the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate (FDR). We study limma-trend through the lens of empirical partially Bayes inference, a paradigm in which a prior is posited and estimated for the nuisance parameters while parameters of interest remain fixed. From this perspective, limma-trend computes approximate partially Bayes p-values that condition on the residual sample variance and the unit-level summary. The same framework…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
