The quenching of the axial-vector coupling constant $g_A$ in $\beta$-decay: joint effects from chiral two-body currents and many-body correlations
Bin-Lei Wang, Wan-Li Lv, Li-Gang Cao, Yi-Fei Niu, Gianluca Colo, Hiroyuki Sagawa, and Feng-Shou Zhang

TL;DR
This paper presents a microscopic approach combining chiral two-body currents and many-body correlations to explain the quenching of the axial-vector coupling constant $g_A$ in nuclear beta decay, accurately reproducing experimental Gamow-Teller strengths.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel microscopic model that simultaneously incorporates chiral two-body currents and many-body correlations to explain $g_A$ quenching in beta decay.
Findings
The model reproduces experimental Gamow-Teller strengths without additional adjustments.
Quenching factors obtained range from approximately 0.73 to 0.80, aligning with empirical values.
Self-consistent calculations in three doubly magic nuclei demonstrate the combined effects of correlations and chiral currents.
Abstract
In nuclear -decay calculations, the axial-vector coupling constant usually needs to be quenched phenomenologically by a factor 0.75 to reproduce {the Gamow-Teller (GT) transition strengths}. We propose a novel approach to quench the GT {strength} of -decay within the microscopic random phase approximation (RPA) plus particle-vibration coupling (PVC) approach, incorporating the contributions of two-body currents (TBC) derived from chiral effective field theory (EFT). Self-consistent RPA+PVC calculations are performed in three doubly magic nuclei, Ni, Sn, and Sn, with various Skyrme energy density functionals, and the effect of TBC is evaluated by using the obtained many-body wavefunctions. A combined effects of the many-body correlations introduced by PVC and chiral TBC quench the GT strength and reproduce…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
