TL;DR
This paper systematically benchmarks various feedforward steering controllers for autonomous racing, revealing that a new empirical approach offers the best robustness and lap times despite lower prediction accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a novel polynomial surface fit (EHD) for feedforward steering control and evaluates its performance against learning-based and empirical methods in a realistic simulation.
Findings
Learning-based controllers have the lowest prediction errors.
Improved prediction accuracy does not necessarily improve lap times.
The proposed EHD method offers superior closed-loop robustness and lap times.
Abstract
Feedforward steering control is a key component of hierarchical control architectures for autonomous racing. The goal is to reduce steering corrections from the feedback controllers by predicting the vehicle's inverse lateral dynamics. This paper presents a systematic benchmark of two learning-based and two empirical (analytical) feedforward steering controllers. We introduce a new \acf{ehd} formulation based on a polynomial surface fit that captures velocity-dependent nonlinear steering behavior with minimal parametrization. We test the feedforward controllers in a high-fidelity simulation framework based on the real-world Abu Dhabi Autonomous Racing League competition, using a high-fidelity double-track vehicle dynamics simulator. Open-loop evaluation shows that the learning-based controllers achieve the lowest prediction errors; however, closed-loop testing reveals that this improved…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
