Thermodynamic and structural behavior of one-dimensional divalent patchy hard rods: Wertheim's first-order thermodynamic perturbation theory versus exact results
Ana M. Montero, Andr\'es Santos, P\'eter Gurin, and Szabolcs Varga

TL;DR
This study examines the thermodynamic and structural properties of one-dimensional divalent patchy hard rods, comparing exact theoretical predictions with results from Wertheim's perturbation theory, highlighting differences between finite-range and sticky interactions.
Contribution
The paper introduces an exact one-dimensional model for divalent patchy rods, improving upon Wertheim's theory by incorporating an exact relation between density and unbonded sites.
Findings
Finite-range SW sites lead to richer structural behavior than sticky sites.
The correlation length exhibits a maximum (Widom line) in the monotonic regime.
High-pressure correlation length scales as p^2 for finite-range, p^3 in sticky limit.
Abstract
We investigate the thermodynamic and structural properties of divalent patchy hard rods confined to a one-dimensional channel by modeling the bonding sites as attractive square-well (SW) patches located at the rod tips. The zero-range sticky limit is recovered by letting the well width vanish while keeping the stickiness parameter finite. While Wertheim's first-order thermodynamic perturbation theory (TPT1) becomes exact in this sticky limit, it fails for finite-range site-site interactions. We show that the theory can be made exact in one dimension by replacing the standard law of mass action with an exact relation between the density and the fraction of unbonded sites, together with an exact bonding free-energy contribution. Finite-range SW sites produce a richer structural behavior than sticky sites, including monotonic and oscillatory asymptotic decay of the pair correlation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
