A compensation theorem for the Sylow-integral invariant and counterexamples to an \texorpdfstring{$A_5$}{A5}-characterization conjecture
Yutong Zhang, Yaoran Yang

TL;DR
The paper disproves a conjecture linking the invariant \\gamma(G)=9/2\\ to the group being isomorphic to A_5 by constructing counterexamples using direct product formulas involving nilpotent groups.
Contribution
It provides a direct-product compensation formula for \\gamma(G) in groups involving A_5 and arbitrary nilpotent factors, and constructs explicit counterexamples to the conjecture.
Findings
Counterexamples to the A_5-characterization conjecture are constructed.
A compensation formula reduces \\gamma(A_5 \\times N) to a finite Egyptian-fraction equation.
Explicit groups G = A_5 \\times N satisfy \\gamma(G)=9/2 but are not isomorphic to A_5.
Abstract
Let \(\nu_p(G)\) be the number of Sylow \(p\)-subgroups of a finite group \(G\), let \(\sigma_p(G)\) be their common order, and set \[ \gamma(G)=\int_0^1\sum_{p\in\pi(G)}\nu_p(G)x^{\sigma_p(G)}\,dx =\sum_{p\in\pi(G)}\frac{\nu_p(G)}{\sigma_p(G)+1}. \] A recent conjectural extension of the simple-group theorem for this invariant asserted that a nonsolvable finite group has \(\gamma(G)=9/2\) precisely when \(G\cong A_5\). We disprove this assertion by a direct and verifiable construction. More generally, we prove an exact direct-product compensation formula for \(A_5\) with an arbitrary nilpotent factor. The formula reduces the equality \(\gamma(A_5\times N)=9/2\) to a finite Egyptian-fraction equation in the orders of the Sylow subgroups of \(N\). Taking \(N=\C_2\times\C_7\times\C_{11}\times\C_{13}\times\C_{17}\times\C_{19}\times\C_{29}\times\C_{71}\times\C_{83}\), the loss in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
