Revisiting the Misspecified Cram\'er-Rao Bound
Malaak Khatib, Nadav Harel, Joseph Tabrikian, and Tirza Routtenberg

TL;DR
This paper critically re-examines the foundations of the misspecified Cramér-Rao bound (MCRB), clarifying its applicability, limitations, and establishing a more rigorous theoretical framework for estimation under model misspecification.
Contribution
It introduces a new derivation of the MCRB based on pointwise equivalent models, clarifies the class of estimators for which it is valid, and links local unbiasedness to achievable bounds.
Findings
Naive MCRB is generally not tight or attainable.
New derivation supports classical MCRB with explicit estimator class.
Defines conditions under which the MML estimator is efficient.
Abstract
Estimation under model misspecification arises in many signal processing problems, where the assumed observation model deviates from the true data-generating mechanism due to errors or simplifications. The misspecified Cram\'er-Rao bound (MCRB) is a widely recognized mean-squared-error (MSE) lower bound for this case, which has originally been used to describe the asymptotic behavior of the misspecified maximum likelihood (MML) estimator. Despite its widespread use, the MCRB lacks a rigorous characterization of the class of estimators for which it is valid. In this paper, we revisit the theory of parameter estimation under model misspecification and re-examine the foundations of the MCRB. We first demonstrate these limitations and examine a naive version of the MCRB, which relies only on local misspecified unbiasedness. We show that this bound is generally not tight and may be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
