Adaptive Multi-Fidelity Structural Optimization under Fluid-Structure Interaction

TL;DR

This paper introduces an adaptive multi-fidelity optimization approach for fluid-structure interaction problems, significantly reducing computational costs while maintaining high accuracy.

Contribution

It develops a hybrid surrogate modeling framework with risk-aware decision-making that updates iteratively during structural optimization under FSI.

Findings

Achieved 80% reduction in computational cost for a shape optimization problem.

Maintained accuracy within 2.3% of fully high-fidelity FSI optimization.

Developed a non-intrusive surrogate update method based on nearest-neighbor and radial interpolation.

Abstract

The design of structures and vehicles subject to fluid-structure interaction (FSI) often requires high-fidelity coupled analysis. While the design variables pertain to the structure, the computational cost is dominated by the fluid solver, making iterative optimization prohibitively expensive. This paper presents an adaptive multi-fidelity optimization method combining high-fidelity FSI analysis with a lightweight surrogate for fluid-induced loads and a decision model that selects between surrogate and high-fidelity fluid evaluations. During optimization, completed FSI analyses incrementally update a non-intrusive surrogate model based on nearest-neighbor search and radial interpolation. A hybrid Lagrangian-Eulerian mapping function is developed to transfer fluid loads between structural designs. The evolution of surface orientation is handled by decomposing the traction vectors into local orthonormal bases. An adaptive Gaussian process regression model is employed to predict surrogate error and quantify uncertainty, allowing risk-aware selection of when coupled analysis is required. As design evaluations cluster near the optimum, the accuracy of the surrogate model naturally improves, thereby reducing the reliance on the fluid solver. It requires no offline training, preserves the high-fidelity structural model in all design evaluations, and ensures that the final design is evaluated by high-fidelity FSI analysis. The fundamental idea is justified theoretically using a simplified model problem, which shows that the leading-order error is a monotonically increasing, concave, and bounded function of the fluid added mass. The framework is demonstrated on two benchmark problems. For shape optimization of a flexible panel under shock loading, results show an $80\%$ reduction in computational cost while maintaining accuracy within $2.3\%$ of fully high-fidelity FSI optimization.