Beyond minimal coupling for charged scalars? Modified electrodynamics and London-penetration tests
F. Minotti, G. Modanese

TL;DR
This paper proposes a modified electrodynamics framework for charged scalar fields that predicts a rescaled magnetic penetration depth in superconductors, and tests this prediction against experimental data from various materials.
Contribution
It introduces a non-gauge-invariant coupling approach for scalar electrodynamics and analyzes its implications for superconducting properties and experimental measurements.
Findings
Rescaled magnetic penetration depth $ o rac{ ext{original}}{ oot 2 ext{}}$ in the modified framework.
Experimental data for Nb, YBCO, and Ba(Fe,Co)$_2$As$_2$ support the hypothesis $ ext{optical} > ext{magnetic}$ penetration depth.
Standard theory predicts $ ext{optical} o ext{magnetic}$ depth equality, contrasting with the modified model.
Abstract
While standard minimal coupling works well for Dirac fermions, its application to scalar fields features a known ``peculiarity'': the term linear in does not coincide with the conserved Noether current of the interacting theory. We recently proposed choosing a different principle for electromagnetic interactions, namely a linear coupling with a (globally) conserved current, accepting the consequence that one must abandon full local gauge invariance in the electromagnetic sector and adopt an extended electrodynamics (of Aharonov--Bohm type) that can couple consistently to non-locally-conserved currents. We present the physical motivations offered for proposing the modified coupling and discuss general consequences of reducing gauge invariance. We then focus on the central condensed-matter claim: for bosonic charged condensates, the modified framework…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
