Shiny Stories, Hidden Struggles: Investigating the Representation of Disability Through the Lens of LLMs

TL;DR

This paper examines how large language models depict disability, revealing they tend to over-idealize experiences and reinforce negative biases, thus misrepresenting the realities faced by disabled communities.

Contribution

It provides a novel analysis comparing LLM-generated social media posts with real posts from people with disabilities, highlighting biases and stereotypes in model representations.

Findings

LLMs produce overly positive stereotypes of disability.

Disproportionate association of topics like career and entertainment with nondisabled individuals.

LLMs struggle to authentically reflect the nuanced realities of marginalized groups.

Abstract

Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently attracted much attention for their ability to simulate human behavior and generate text that reflects personas and demographic groups. While these capabilities can open up a multitude of diverse applications across fields, it is crucial to examine how such models represent various target groups since LLMs can perpetuate and amplify biases or discrimination against historically marginalized communities or, alternatively, as a result of debiasing efforts, overcorrect by portraying overly positive stereotypes. This overcompensation can idealize these groups, erasing the complexities and challenges they face in favor of unrealistic depictions. In this paper, we investigate how LLMs represent disability by simulating the perspectives of individuals with disabilities in generating social media posts. These posts are then compared with those written by real people with disabilities, focusing on emotional tone, sentiment, and representative words and themes. Our analysis reveals two key findings: (1) LLMs often idealize the experiences of people with disabilities, producing overly positive stereotypes that, despite appearing uplifting, fail to authentically capture their lived realities; and (2) a comparative analysis of posts simulating individuals with and without disabilities highlights a negative bias, where certain topics, such as career and entertainment, are disproportionately associated with nondisabled individuals. This reinforces exclusionary narratives and over-idealized portrayals of disability, misrepresenting the actual challenges faced by this community. These findings align with broader concerns and ongoing research showing that LLMs struggle to reflect the diverse realities of society, particularly the nuanced experiences of marginalized groups, and underscore the need for critical scrutiny of their representations.