Beyond Isotropy in JEPAs: Hamiltonian Geometry and Symplectic Prediction
Robert Jenkinson Alvarez

TL;DR
This paper challenges the default isotropic regularization in joint embedding predictive architectures, proposing a Hamiltonian geometry approach that improves representation quality and downstream task performance.
Contribution
It introduces HamJEPA, a novel Hamiltonian-based model that encodes views as phase-space states, enhancing cross-view prediction and outperforming existing methods on standard benchmarks.
Findings
HamJEPA improves CIFAR-100 kNN@20 by +4.89 and linear-probe by +3.52 points at 30 epochs.
HamJEPA achieves +6.45 kNN@20 and +10.64 linear-probe points at 80 epochs on CIFAR-100.
On ImageNet-100, HamJEPA-$q$ improves by +4.82 kNN@20 and +7.52 linear-probe points at 45 epochs.
Abstract
JEPAs often regularize one-view embeddings toward an isotropic Gaussian, implicitly baking Euclidean symmetry into the representation. We show that this is not merely a benign default. For a known structured downstream geometry , the minimax and maximum-entropy covariance under a Hamiltonian energy budget is , and Euclidean isotropy incurs a closed-form price of isotropy. More importantly, when the downstream geometry is unknown, no geometry-independent fixed marginal target is canonical: every fixed covariance shape can be maximally misaligned for some structured geometry. We further show that even oracle one-view marginals do not identify the JEPA view-to-view predictive coupling. These results suggest that the structural bias in JEPAs should enter the cross-view coupling rather than a fixed encoder marginal. We instantiate this principle with \textbf{HamJEPA},…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
