Physics-Informed Graph Neural Network Surrogates for Turbulent Nanoparticle Dispersion in Dental Clinical Environments

TL;DR

This paper introduces ELGIN, a physics-informed graph neural network surrogate that accurately predicts turbulent nanoparticle dispersion in dental clinics, enabling real-time infection risk assessment.

Contribution

ELGIN combines advanced graph transformer techniques with physics-informed training to significantly accelerate CFD simulations for dental aerosol dispersion.

Findings

ELGIN reduces parcel displacement error from 19.56% to 16.20%.

ELGIN achieves a 37x speedup over traditional CFD methods.

ELGIN accurately tracks particle cloud dynamics in a clinical environment.

Abstract

Dental aerosol procedures produce sub-50 micrometre nuclei that can remain airborne for long periods in enclosed clinics, creating pathways for airborne pathogen transmission. Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations with Euler-Lagrange particle tracking capture this transport accurately but require very long run times per scenario, which precludes real-time clinical decision support in 3D. We present the Eulerian-Lagrangian Graph Interaction Network (ELGIN), a physics-informed graph surrogate that jointly predicts carrier-flow dynamics on the OpenFOAM polyhedral mesh and the per-parcel motion of the polydisperse spray cloud. ELGIN couples a multi-head Graph Transformer with Jacobi-preconditioned learnable pressure projection and a turbulence-closure head to a sigmoid-gated Lagrangian Interaction Network through differentiable inverse-distance mesh-parcel coupling, and advances parcels with a symplectic Stormer-Verlet integrator. A four-stage physics-informed curriculum stabilises 260-step autoregressive rollouts without gradient explosion. A parameter sweep with foam-extend 4.1 OpenFOAM reactingParcelFoam across clinically relevant ventilation rates and handpiece spray speeds provides CFD ground truth. This article reports a single-case demonstration in which both ELGIN and a Lagrangian-only baseline (M0) are trained and evaluated on Sweep_Case_03 of a twenty-case sweep; full 16/2/2 retraining is in progress and will replace all reported metrics. On this case, ELGIN tracks the foam-extend particle cloud much more closely than M0: mean parcel displacement error falls from 19.56% to 16.20% of room width and cloud radius-of-gyration error from 9.85% to 6.58%. A 26-second rollout completes in ~64 s on a 4 GB GPU, approximately 37x faster than the foam-extend reference pipeline, toward per-appointment infection-risk screening once the multi-case checkpoint is in place.