Efficient Elicitation of Collective Disagreements
Mohamed Ouaguenouni, Felipe Garrido-Lucero, Umberto Grandi, C\'esar Hidalgo, Magdalena Tydrichova

TL;DR
This paper introduces a stratified framework and the plurality matrix to efficiently measure and analyze disagreements among voters, highlighting the limitations of pairwise comparisons and proposing protocols for better preference elicitation.
Contribution
It proposes a new plurality matrix concept and a stratified framework to identify minimal preference information needed for disagreement measures, advancing beyond traditional pairwise comparisons.
Findings
Many disagreement measures are at level 3, requiring more than pairwise comparisons.
Going beyond level 3 provides better insights into voter disagreements.
Protocols are designed to balance participant number and cognitive load.
Abstract
We analyze the structure of the disagreement among a population of voters over a set of alternatives. Surveys typically ask either for pairwise comparisons, simple and intuitive for participants, or full rankings over alternatives, eliciting the entire voters' preferences. Building on the observation that pairwise comparisons cannot distinguish structural disagreement from noise, we propose a stratified framework to identify the minimal aggregated preference information needed to compute a number of disagreement measures from the literature. Specifically, we introduce the plurality matrix, a generalization of pairwise comparisons that records, for every subset of alternatives, the probability that each ranks first in . We define the level of a disagreement measure as the smallest subset size needed to express it, showing that many existing notions, including…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
