Conflict-Resilient Multi-Agent Reasoning via Signed Graph Modeling
Longgang He, Longzhu He, Daojing He, Chaozhuo Li

TL;DR
The paper introduces SIGMA, a signed graph-based framework for multi-agent reasoning that explicitly models conflicts and trust, leading to more accurate and conflict-resilient predictions across various benchmarks.
Contribution
SIGMA is the first framework to incorporate explicit conflict and trust modeling via signed graphs in multi-agent reasoning, improving robustness and accuracy.
Findings
SIGMA outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on six benchmark datasets.
It achieves significant gains in accuracy and conflict resilience.
The framework is effective across multiple LLM backbones and configurations.
Abstract
LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) have demonstrated strong reasoning and decision-making capabilities that consistently surpass those of single LLM agents. However, their performance often suffers from naive aggregation mechanisms that assume uniformly cooperative interactions. Upon close inspection, we observe that existing graph-based MAS frameworks (1) propagate errors when conflicting signals arise without control, and (2) lack explicit modeling of conflicting inter-agent relations as well as structural awareness, failing to identify reliable interaction patterns. To bridge this gap, we introduce SIGMA, a novel SIgned Graph-informed Multi-Agent reasoning framework that explicitly captures trust, conflict, and neutral relations among agents via a signed relational graph. Specifically, given a query, SIGMA first selects a set of relevant and diverse agents, then constructs a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
