Atomistic Modeling of Chemical Disorder in Materials: Bridging Classical Methods and AI-Assisted Approaches
Jiayu Peng, Peichen Zhong

TL;DR
This review discusses how classical and AI methods can be combined to better model chemical disorder in materials, improving accuracy and efficiency in materials discovery.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of classical and AI-driven approaches to bridge the representation gap in modeling chemical disorder, outlining a practical roadmap for disorder-native AI.
Findings
AI accelerates classical schemes by reducing microstate evaluation costs.
AI enables disorder-native capabilities like generative models and kinetics-aware predictions.
The framework outlines a pathway for AI to transform disorder modeling in materials science.
Abstract
Chemical disorder, originating from the mixed occupation of crystallographic sites by multiple elements, is widespread in alloys, ceramics, and compositionally complex materials, where short- and long-range orderings can strongly influence properties. A central obstacle is the representation gap between experiments and simulations: experiments often report disorder as partial occupancies and ensemble-averaged behaviors, whereas atomistic simulations and AI workflows usually require fully specified configurations. Tackling this gap requires computational methods that convert averaged disorder descriptions into representative configurational ensembles while balancing cost, bias, and fidelity. This challenge has become more urgent in AI-driven computational discovery, where ignoring disorder may cause AI workflows to misrank stability, misjudge novelty, and misdirect experiments with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
