Near-Resolution of the Tradeoff Conjecture in Distributed Proof Labeling Schemes
Arnold Filtser, Orr Fischer

TL;DR
This paper proves the Tradeoff Conjecture in distributed proof labeling schemes up to a logarithmic factor, establishing a near-optimal relationship between label size and hop count for certifying network properties.
Contribution
It resolves the longstanding Tradeoff Conjecture for general and minor-free graphs, providing tight bounds and refuting a stronger previously conjectured variant.
Findings
Proves that 1-PLS with cost p implies t-PLS with cost O(t log n) in general graphs.
Shows that for minor-free graphs, 1-PLS with cost p implies t-PLS with cost O(ceil(p/t)+log n).
Refutes a stronger variant of the Tradeoff Conjecture, demonstrating limitations of large neighborhood size.
Abstract
In the -Proof Labeling Scheme model (-PLS model), our goal is to certify that a network of nodes satisfies a given property . A prover assigns a label to each node, and each node decides to accept or reject based on its labeled -hop neighborhood. If holds, there exists a labeling that makes all nodes accept. If does not hold, in all labelings at least one node rejects. The cost of a scheme is its maximum label size. The Tradeoff Conjecture [Feuilloley, Fraigniaud, Hirvonen, Paz, and Perry, DISC 18, Dist. Comput.~21] hypothesizes that the existence of a -PLS for a property with cost implies the existence of a -PLS for with cost . The conjecture was initially shown to hold for specific graph classes, such as trees, cycles, and grids. Later, a weaker cost was shown for fixed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
