DG = FEM + flat elements, Part I: Diffusion
Ji\v{r}\'i Szotkowski, V\'aclav Ku\v{c}era, Chi-Wang Shu, Antoine Quiriny, Jonathan Lambrechts, Nicolas Mo\"es, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Remacle

TL;DR
This paper introduces a simple method to connect finite element and discontinuous Galerkin methods for Poisson's problem by inserting dummy elements, enabling easy implementation and adaptive switching between the two methods.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous derivation and proof of optimal error estimates for a novel TFEM-DG scheme that simplifies DG implementation within FEM codes.
Findings
Proves convergence of the scheme to DG with trapezoidal quadrature.
Demonstrates optimal $H^1$ and $L^2$ error estimates.
Shows numerical experiments in 2D and 3D confirm theoretical results.
Abstract
We establish a simple, rigorous, and easy to implement connection between the classical continuous finite element method (FEM) and the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method for Poisson's problem. The key idea is to insert a vanishing-thickness layer of "dummy" elements along cell interfaces. By modifying the diffusion coefficient on these elements to be proportional to their thickness, we prove the FEM formulation converges to Babu\v{s}ka-Zl\'amal DG with trapezoidal edge quadrature. The scheme is trivial to implement by (i) a mesh edit that introduces degenerate interface elements and (ii) a single Jacobian threshold in an otherwise unmodified FEM code to handle the degenerate elements via the tempered finite element (TFEM) framework. We provide a rigorous derivation of the resulting TFEM-DG scheme, prove optimal and error estimates, and present numerical experiments in 2D and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
