Efficient Conditioning Why Pseudo Observation Batch Bayesian Optimization Works When It Does not
Kumbha Nagaswetha, Rabi Pathak

TL;DR
This paper provides a unified theoretical framework for batch Bayesian Optimization methods like Constant Liar and Kriging Believer, demonstrating their effectiveness through efficient conditioning with Gaussian Processes and validating predictions with extensive experiments.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of efficient conditioning as a key property, unifies existing batch methods under a single mechanism, and proposes the Structural Diversity Diagnostic for surrogate model testing.
Findings
Gaussian Processes produce distinct batch points with separation of order l.
Efficient conditioning extends to Multiquadric RBF networks.
Neural networks regain diversity at 15x the GP conditioning cost.
Abstract
Constant Liar (CL), Kriging Believer (KB), and fantasy models are widely used for batch selection in parallel Bayesian Optimization, yet a unified theory explaining their effectiveness and conditions under which they fail has been lacking. We identify efficient conditioning as the key surrogate property the ability to update predictions in closed form when data is augmented. We prove that Gaussian Processes satisfy this requirement, producing provably distinct batch points with separation of order l, and that this holds for any acquisition function monotonically non decreasing in posterior uncertainty (EI, UCB, PI), with qualitatively similar behavior for Thompson Sampling. We unify CL, KB, and fantasy models as instances of a single conditioning mechanism differing only in the lie value distribution, and draw quantitative connections to Local Penalization (LP) and qualitative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
