Violin ''Playing-In'': Disentangling Physical Change from Player Adaptation via Physical Measurements
Hugo Pauget Ballesteros, Philippe Lalitte (IReMus,LEAD), Vincent Lostanlen (LS2N,LS2N - \'equipe SIMS), Claudia Fritz (IJLRDA-LAM)

TL;DR
This longitudinal study investigated whether a violin physically changes or if player adaptation explains the 'playing-in' effect, finding no significant physical or behavioral changes over six months.
Contribution
The study provides empirical evidence that the 'playing-in' phenomenon is not due to physical evolution of the instrument or fundamental changes in player technique.
Findings
No significant physical changes in the violin after six months.
Player's bowing strategy showed no significant drift.
The 'playing-in' effect is unlikely due to physical or behavioral adaptation.
Abstract
It is a widespread belief among musicians that a violin's sound ``opens up'' or improves through regular playing. However, physical evidence for this ``playing-in'' effect remains elusive. This study revisited the phenomenon by testing two hypotheses: (1) the instrument undergoes physical evolution, or (2) the player undergoes behavioral adaptation. We conducted a longitudinal study centered on a seldom-played test violin played daily by a professional soloist for six months, alongside two stored control violins and a control group of ten violinists (N=10). All three violins had been rarely played prior to the experiment. Assessments performed at the beginning (``Before'' phase) and end (``After'' phase) of the period included input admittance measurements via laser vibrometry, standardized sound recordings, and acquisition of the soloist's bowing gestures via motion capture. Results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
