A Hycean Interpretation of K2-18b Supported by Photochemical Atmospheric Compositional
Takuya Fujisawa, Masashi Shimada, Tatsuya Yoshida, Kiyoshi Kuramoto

TL;DR
This study evaluates whether Hycean atmospheric models can explain K2-18b's JWST spectra, finding that such models with specific compositions are consistent with observations, thus supporting a potential Hycean interpretation.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that self-consistent Hycean atmospheric models can fit current JWST spectra of K2-18b, expanding the possible interpretations of its nature.
Findings
Hycean models with a 1 bar H2 envelope and specific CH4, CO, CO2 levels fit the spectra.
Photochemical networks drive CO to 1-2% mixing ratios, consistent with observations.
Current data cannot definitively exclude Hycean scenarios for K2-18b.
Abstract
The nature of the sub-Neptune K2-18b is debated between Hycean and mini-Neptune interpretations. We test whether self-consistent Hycean atmospheres are compatible with current JWST transmission spectra by combining one-dimensional photochemical modelling, radiative--convective equilibrium calculations, and forward modelling of transmission spectra. We assume H2-CH4-H2O atmospheres over a liquid ocean, compute altitude-dependent abundances with a 1D photochemical model, and couple them to P-T profiles that avoid runaway greenhouse states. Using the CH4-dominated 2.8-4.0 m band, we constrain wavelength-independent offsets between NIRISS SOSS and NIRSpec G395H for multiple reductions, and then scan grids of CO and CO2 scaling factors, weighted by the CH4-band offset posteriors, to evaluate oxidised-carbon abundances consistent with the 4-5 m region. Radiative--convective…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
