Disarranged Harmonization of Transparency Reporting by Social Media Platforms Under the Digital Services Act
Amaury Trujillo, Benedetta Tessa, Stefano Cresci

TL;DR
This study systematically evaluates the data quality of transparency reports from major EU social media platforms post-DSA regulation, revealing persistent issues and proposing improvements for better interoperability and reliability.
Contribution
First comprehensive assessment of post-DSA transparency reporting quality across leading social media platforms, highlighting ongoing issues and suggesting targeted enhancements.
Findings
All platforms showed issues with data formatting, timeliness, and completeness.
Different reporting procedures caused inconsistent information across mechanisms.
Persistent issues hinder interoperability despite harmonization efforts.
Abstract
The European Commission recently introduced new regulation to harmonize transparency reporting of large online platforms under the Digital Services Act (DSA). Here, we present the first systematic evaluation of transparency reporting data quality after this normative change, for the eight largest social media platforms in the European Union. In detail, we run a set of large-scale quantitative analyses on key reporting dimensions, followed by a structured comparative assessment across platforms and reporting mechanisms. Among our findings is that: (i) the analyzed platforms had varying degrees of compliance and data quality, but all exhibited issues on data formatting, timeliness, consistency, and completeness; (ii) some platforms employed differing reporting procedures across mechanisms, which caused them to submit contrasting information; (iii) despite the harmonization, a number of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
