Schedule-dependent basin occupation in a programmable quantum annealer

TL;DR

This study investigates how schedule-dependent basin occupation in a programmable quantum annealer varies across different instances and schedules, revealing complex behaviors not captured by simple landscape features.

Contribution

It introduces a novel protocol using cycled reverse annealing and a parallel-tempering framework to probe instance-specific basin occupation dynamics.

Findings

Late-time autocorrelation sits between two equilibrium processes at the device's effective temperature.

Schedule shape influences basin occupation, with shifts up to 38 percentage points.

Simple linear predictors fail to capture schedule sensitivity across instances.

Abstract

On a mixed-frustration 12-qubit Ising instance run on two D-Wave generations, Advantage2 Zephyr and Advantage_system6.4 Pegasus, the late-time subsystem autocorrelation under cycled reverse annealing sits strictly between two equilibrium reference processes at the device-calibrated effective temperature: localized parallel tempering, and delocalized equilibrated path-integral simulated quantum annealing at a fixed Advantage2 pause-point transverse-field scale. The bracket holds on all three tested schedules and at both hardware calibrations. We obtain this result through two ingredients: a cycled reverse-anneal protocol (reinitialize_state=False, 50 cycles per submission) used as a Markov-chain probe of the device's pause-point dynamics, and a parallel-tempering falsification framework with bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap 95% confidence intervals. Of eighteen tested (instance, schedule) combinations on Advantage2, three are PT-unmatched and correspond to two distinct Ising instances; an independent native-graph control with no minor embedding on a third mixed-frustration instance reproduces the same direction of mismatch. Among twenty random training instances, schedule shape modulates basin occupation on six of the thirteen multi-basin-in-readout instances, with dominant-configuration shifts of up to 38 percentage points including changes of the dominant configuration. A pre-registered linear predictor of schedule sensitivity from exhaustively computable landscape features fails on ten held-out instances, indicating that schedule sensitivity is not captured by simple linear functions of the tested landscape moments. The bracketing result revises an earlier two-pause-enhancement claim and reframes reverse-anneal schedules as instance-specific basin-occupation probes rather than universal quantum-enhancement knobs.