Scale-Equivariant Generative Forecasting: Weight-Tied Dilated Convolutions, Wavelet Scattering Inputs, and Spectral-Consistency Training for Self-Similar Time Series

TL;DR

This paper introduces a scale-equivariant generative model for self-similar time series, leveraging weight-tied dilated convolutions, wavelet scattering inputs, and spectral consistency to improve efficiency and fidelity.

Contribution

The authors define discrete scale equivariance for 1D causal networks, prove kernel weight sharing enforces it, and integrate this with wavelet and spectral priors in a novel SE-WaveNet architecture.

Findings

SE-WaveNet reproduces empirical scaling in S&P 500 data

Uses fewer parameters than vanilla models while maintaining performance

Achieves competitive NLL, calibration, and tail metrics

Abstract

Many natural and engineered time series -- equity returns, climate anomalies, turbulent velocities, neural recordings, packet-level network traffic -- are approximately self-similar: their horizon-$T$ distribution is tied to the horizon-$1$ distribution by one scaling exponent $H$. Standard deep generative sequence models (transformers, dilated TCNs, the WaveNet family) ignore this. Their receptive fields are wide, but kernel parameters live independently at every dilation level, yielding a multi-scale architecture, not a scale-equivariant one. We make three contributions. First, we give a precise definition of discrete scale equivariance for 1D causal networks and prove that dyadic dilation commutes (up to boundary effects) with any dilated-convolution stack whose kernel weights are shared across levels. Tying the kernel shrinks the convolutional parameter budget by an $L$-fold factor (where $L$ is depth) and hard-wires self-similarity in as an inductive bias. Second, we wrap this Scale-Equivariant WaveNet (SE-WaveNet) backbone in three components that carry the same prior: a one-level Daubechies-4 wavelet input, a Hurst-FiLM block exposing the local scaling exponent, and a spectral-consistency training term targeting the $|f|^{-(2H+1)}$ power-law spectrum. The head is a conditional normalising flow, chosen to preserve equivariance. Third, on 30 years of S&P 500 daily log-returns, SE-WaveNet samples reproduce the empirical scaling-collapse diagnostic on the Allan-Variance top-25 universe (median $\mathcal{C}^\star = 0.020$), while a vanilla WaveNet at matched capacity does not ($\geq 0.06$). NLL, KS-calibration, and tail energy distance tie or beat the baseline, with $L\times$ fewer convolutional parameters.