Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Review
H\"useyin \"Ozg\"ur Kamal{\i}, Erdem Tuna, Vahid Haratian, Eray T\"uz\"un

TL;DR
This paper proposes a comprehensive AI-powered code review framework that integrates specialized agents with human oversight to improve efficiency, accountability, and collaboration in the evolving landscape of AI-assisted software development.
Contribution
It introduces a novel end-to-end AI-driven code review workflow framework that combines AI agents with human judgment at key decision points.
Findings
Identifies five stages of the proposed AI-assisted code review process.
Highlights open challenges like reliability, bias, privacy, and transparency.
Provides a research agenda for human-AI collaboration in code review.
Abstract
Code review has evolved for decades, from informal peer checking to today's pull request (PR) workflows, yet it remains a largely manual, uneven, and cognitively demanding process. The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) coding assistants has intensified this challenge: while these tools increase code production velocity, they also expand the volume of code requiring review, turning code review into a growing bottleneck. Current AI support remains fragmented, with tools focusing on isolated tasks such as reviewer recommendation, PR description generation, or comment suggestion rather than the end-to-end PR review workflow. In this paper, we review the historical evolution of code review practices and examine the shift driven by large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI systems. We then present a vision for an AI-powered code review workflow combining specialized agents with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
