TL;DR
This paper explores using off-the-shelf Vision-Language Models for face image quality assessment in a zero-shot setting, evaluating their interpretability, robustness, and performance compared to traditional methods.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework for VLM-based FIQA, analyzing their performance, interpretability, and robustness, and demonstrates their potential as an interpretable complement to existing methods.
Findings
VLMs' utility depends on architecture, not just parameter count.
Most VLM outputs align with traditional FIQA methods.
Increasing parameter count improves internal consistency but worsens degradation detection.
Abstract
Face Image Quality Assessment (FIQA) is a crucial control step in biometric pipelines. It ensures only reliable samples are processed to maintain system accuracy. State-of-the-art FIQA methods achieve high utility but typically operate as "black boxes." They produce scalar scores without human-interpretable justifications. This lack of transparency limits their effectiveness in human-in-the-loop scenarios, such as automated border control, where actionable feedback is essential. In this paper, we investigate the potential of off-the-shelf Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to bridge this gap by performing FIQA in a zero-shot setting. We present a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing VLM performance. This involves benchmarking traditional FIQA methods through error-versus-reject curves. Additionally, using a diverse set of datasets, ranging from surveillance-oriented to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
