Comparison of Tomographic Reconstruction Algorithms for Infrared Imaging Video Bolometer Diagnostic in Plasma Devices
Vinit Pandya, Santosh P. Pandya, Ansh Patel, Kumudni Tahiliani, Kumar Ajay

TL;DR
This paper compares three tomographic reconstruction algorithms—MFI, PTR, and MLEM—for infrared bolometer data in plasma diagnostics, evaluating their accuracy, stability, and real-time applicability.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of reconstruction methods for IRVB data, including implementation details, synthetic validation, and practical tradeoffs.
Findings
MLEM offers better peak preservation and robustness to noise.
PTR is faster but less accurate in complex profiles.
MFI provides stable reconstructions with moderate computational cost.
Abstract
Infrared Imaging Video Bolometer (IRVB) measures total radiation power loss from plasma in 2 dimensions through a pinhole camera geometry. Where a free-standing thin metal foil act as a broad band absorber from Soft X-Rays to IR radiation. This configuration produces line-integrated signals with poloidal and toroidal coverage that must be inverted to recover the plasma radiation emissivity distribution on a poloidal cross-section. This study compares the tomographic methods implemented to IRVB brightness data reconstruction, namely Minimum Fisher Information (MFI), Phillips-Tikhonov regularization (PTR), and Maximum-Likelihood Expectation-Maximization (MLEM). The comparison assessment is organized around several aspects of bolometer measurements, namely viewing geometry configuration, non-negativity, robustness to noise, sensitivity to prior assumptions, convergence speed, and peak…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
